Want this question answered?
A; SURE but only if there are witnesses and hard evidence
it is possible, usually in addition to other charges that are filed. example: aggressor attacks an individual in additional to assault and battery and other charges if there is a pattern or overwhelming evidence that the was a predisposition against or prejudice towards the individual there may be the additional charges for Hate crime...like pornography hard to describe, but you will know it when you see it.
I would press charges. That is abuse.
You can file, but it would be very very hard to assemble a case since it was not reported immediately.
If under 18 yes, although it may be hard if it all depends on her testimony and she doesn't want to.
Yes, the mother of the girl can try and press charges against your son, but if the 14 year old girl said he never touched her then it will be hard to prove. It would wise of you to get a lawyer for your son because the mother of the girl could well press charges and you want to be prepared.
Because to press a button to shift a button is like pressing shift to press hard.
In Manson's biography (A Long Hard Road Out Of Hell) he talks about when he was arrested (I think in Utah) for indecent exposure, he was held overnight then released because they didn't have sufficient evidence to press full charges.
A parent (or gardian) can press charges for touching their child anywhere, (feet, hands stomach etc) Is it a sexual act? In societal norm today the foot fetish is not that uncommon. Proving the accused does have a foot fetish, that may be a bit hard to prove. But reguardless of where the accused touched the minor child, if "you" as a parent feel it was inappropriot, then by all means press charges, nothing may come to it, but at least its on record. Now, when can a parent press charges or "not" that I am unclear of. As far as I know, a parent can press charges on anything they deem inappropriot to their child or children when touching is involved, perhaps lewd act on a child or minor? Im no attorny, I'm just taking a stab at it. * Individuals do not "press charges" they file complaints. Complaints are then referred to the prosecutor's office and then it is decided whether or not the person who alledgedly commited the act should be arrested and charged with a crime. The first step is for the parents of the minor child to contact the state's child protective services for assistance.
Don't understand the question. Hard evidence IS the best proof.
Not usually.... and if there is conflicting complaints the officer can always arrest for a "criss-cross" assault.
Felony convictions and discrimintation are hard cases becuase the there are so many ways they can legally bar you from things. It the right of the government and the employer to denie you what ever they choose.