0
No. Ian Wilson (Jesus: The Evidence) says it can come as quite a shock to discover that no one can even be sure who wrote the gospels. Despite the versions printed in our Bibles long having borne the names Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, these names are mere attributions, and even as such are rather less reliable than attributions given to unsigned works of art. The gospels were written far too late, and not by the reliable sources genrally assumed, to be considered historical.
Mark's Gospel ought to be the most reliable, since it was the first gospel to be written, and the authors of the other gospels relied, directly or indirectly, on it for everything they knew about the life and mission of Jesus. However, Mark is well-known for its geographical and cultural errors, so is also unlikely to have provided an accurate portrayal of Jesus.
The view of Jesus, and of the disciples, provided by by each gospel differs from each other. For example, Mark's Gospel portrays Jesus as fully human, adopted by God at his baptism; Matthewand Luke portray Jesus as the Son of God from conception; John portrays Jesus as pre-existing and fully divine.
We can neither confirm nor add to the view of Jesus provided by the gospels, because there is no historical evidence, and even the other early Christian texts are unhelpful. Rudolf Bultmann, acknowledged by many as the twentieth century's most influential theological thinker, condemned as useless further attempts to try to reconstruct the Jesus of history: I do indeed think that we can now know almost nothing concerning the life and personality of Jesus, since the early Christian sources show no interest in either, are moreover fragmentary and often legendary.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Gospels provide a theological perspective on the life and teachings of Jesus rather than a strictly historical account. Scholars debate the accuracy and interpretations found in the Gospels. They are important documents for understanding Jesus' message and impact, but should be read in their historical and literary context.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How many of the Gospels tell the story of Jesus' death and sufferings?
Although told from different points of view, all four of the gospels tell of Christ's suffering, death, and resurrection.
Did Jesus perform miracles in Palestine?
Most Christians believe: yes he did, just as recorded in the gospels. Some, such as the Jesus Seminar, say that not all the events described in the gospels really happened, but Jesus may have performed some miracles in Palestine. Finally, others point out that there are credible reasons for rejecting the historicity of each miracle in the New Testament. On this last view, Jesus did not perform any miracles.
The four gospels are?
The four canonical Gospels are recognized by Christians as being those written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The Gospels take their names from their assumed authors and comprise the first part of the New Testament compilation.The four Gospels — Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John — each present the life and/or ministry of Jesus from the author's point of view.
How many Gospels are there in the 1st testament?
4 gospels. 3 are from the same point of view then John
What does the Gospels contain?
The Gospels are the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The name of the book is the name of the person who's point of view the story is told from. These four gospels (Gospel is translated as 'The good news') tell the life of Jesus, from his birth to his ascension to heaven.
Example of extolled in a sentence?
It is a view, which is often extolled in the gospels.
Why are Gospels described as documents of faith?
Gospels are described as documents of faith because they present the teachings and stories of Jesus Christ from a perspective of belief and devotion. They aim to inspire and strengthen the faith of believers rather than provide a purely historical or factual account of events. Gospels convey the message of salvation and the significance of Jesus' life, death, and resurrection for Christians.
Which of the gospel authors knew Jesus best?
----------------------- The four New Testament gospels were written anonymously and only attributed to the apostles whose names they now bear later in the second century. If we rely on those attributions, only Matthew and John actually knew Jesus, since Mark and Luke were not among the twelve disciples. The second-century Church Fathers also formed the view that the "disciple whom Jesus loved" in John's Gospel was John himself, basing this on the assumption that John was being modest. On the basis of these multiple assumptions, John was the gospel author who knew Jesus best. However, modern scholars say that the gospels could not have been written by eyewitnesses to the events they protray. On this view, the Church Fathers were mistaken in attributing the two gospels to Matthew and John. None of the gospel writers even knew Jesus personally.
Why do different Gospels disagree on whether Jesus carried the cross?
A:Even if we believe that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John wrote the gospels attributed to them, none of them was likely to have been present at the time. In fact, the four gospels were all anonymous until the Church Fathers sought to establish who, in their view, probably wrote each of the gospels. Modern New Testament scholars say that none of the gospels could have been eyewitnesses to the events portrayed in the gospels, so details such as this would not really have been known. We now know that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were substantially based on Mark's Gospel, so when the author of Mark reported that Simon of Cyrene was ordered to carry the cross, the other two synoptic gospels reported the same.A theme throughout John's Gospel is that Jesus did not suffer. For example, rather than have Jesus pray alone and in agony in the Garden of Gethsemene, it says that he offered a triumphant prayer before entering the Garden and was arrested as soon as he entered. In this gospel, he was not placed on the cross until the sixth hour (12 noon), and died in just three hours. When he died, he did not say, "My God. My God. Why hast thou forsaken me?" as in Mark and Matthew, but a dignified, "It is finished." The need for Simon to carry the cross is evidence of Jesus' suffering, which is foreign to John's account. For this reason, Jesus carried the cross to Golgotha.
Why did the writers of the Gospels finally write the stories in the final stage of their formation?
A "CrossRoads minicourse" describes Three Stages of Gospel Development as:The ministry of JesusPostresurrectional preaching of the apostlesThe Writing of the Gospels by the EvangelistsThe minicourse says 'The Evangelists didn’t write the Gospels to give us “histories,” as we use the term. They wrote so readers would “come to believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God” (John 20:31)'. In other words, the gospels may not always be based on actual events or sayings of Jesus, but at least they were written to convince their audiences.A popular view, at least in the twentieth century, was that the gospels were finally written down because those who had experienced the message of Jesus were becoming old and it was feared that the stories would be lost unless they were written down soon. This implies that the Evangelists wrote the gospels as accurate "histories", as we understand the term - a view that would be in direct contradiction to the statement above.The gospels were originally anonymous and were actually written much later than formerly believed. The first New Testament gospel to be written was Mark's Gospel, now believed to have been written approximately 70 CE. We know the other gospels were written much later, because the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were substantially based on Mark and the Gospel of John appears to have been loosely based on material from both Mark and Luke.Thus, Matthew, Luke and John could not have been written until Mark had been written and was circulating in Christian communities. Mark's Gospel appears to have been influenced by Paul's epistles, so this gospel could not have been written until after the time of Paul. This places us in the final stage of gospel formation.
What do you believe about Jesus?
There are many views about Jesus. Of course, the dominant view in Christian countries is based on the gospels, which tell us that Jesus was the Son of God, that he lived in Palestine in the first century and that he died for our sins. The Islamic view is that he was a prophet of God and a predecessor to Muhammad, but was not divine. A very different view is that the gospel Jesus did not really exist, and that Jesus was originally worshipped as a spiritual saviour in heaven, but that the author of Mark's Gospel created a story of Jesus of Nazareth, possibly to deflect Roman interest in what this strange sect really believed. On that view, people began to believe the gospel story and even rewrite it in improved forms, much to the surprise of its author. One extension of this view is that Christianity was an underground Jewish religion, possibly based on the sun god, while another is that it was a version of the mystery religions that had become popular around that time. I believe that the view that Jesus of Nazareth did not really exist is the most credible, athough I would not entirely rule out his existence.
What language does the word synoptic gospels come from?
The term "synoptic gospels" comes from Greek. The word "synoptic" is derived from the Greek words "syn" (together) and "opsis" (seeing), referring to the fact that the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke present a similar view of Jesus' life and teachings.
