0
What else can I help you with?
Where does separation of powers do not apply in UK?
Separation of powers is the doctrine that the individual branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial) have separate and unique powers the others cannot impinge upon . Separation of powers is the doctrine that the individual branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial) have separate and unique powers the others cannot impinge upon .
Which branch of government predominates the others?
Executive
What example of the constitutions system of checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
What is an example of constitutions system of checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
What is an example of the Constitution system checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
What is an example of constitution's system of checks and balances?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
Is an example of the constitutions system of checks and balanced?
The legislature passes laws; the executive executes the laws (that is, acts in accordance with them) and the judiciary decides on them. The three arms of government 'check and balance' each other. For instance, if the legislature passes a law that requires X, but the executive does Y, a person can go to the judiciary (that is, court) and ask for a ruling. The judge may then decide, on arguments made by both parties, that the legislature meant X, or Z, or indeed, Y, and may rule accordingly. For instance, if the judge finds that the law does mean X and the executive has been doing Y, people disadvantaged may have grounds for damages against the executive. This system means that the one part of govenment doesn't do all the functions of government, but they are divided by the constitution into different arms which check the excesses of the others, and balance the forces of each other to protect the citizenry.
Who should have more power executive or legislature in any country?
The three branches of the US Government share responsibility according to the US Constitution. The question of who should have more power the executive or legislative is not a valid question. The Constitution provides for the duties of each branch. The US Government cannot operate fairly with any of its branches exerting more power than the others.
What system is in place when the president chooses will be a supreme court justice?
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
What system is in a place when the president chooses who will be a supreme court justice?
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
What system is in place when the president chooses who will be the Supreme Court justice?
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
What system is in place when the president choose who will a supreme court justice?
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
