0
hell yeah boyeee!!!!!hahahaahahah flavor flav
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
What do the conclusions tell about the experiment?
The conclusions tell why the data support or reject the hypothesis.
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What do scientists do to determine if their results support their hypothesis?
The results can support their hypothesis by comparing the results, or setting them out in a table or graph. Conclusions can also be written to simplify the process.
A sentence for invalid?
The premises on which he based his conclusions were invalid.
What is deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true?
It is the process of reasoning known as deduction. This involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are believed to be true. Deductive reasoning is often associated with formal logic and mathematics, where conclusions necessarily follow from the stated premises.
What is intermediate conclusion?
conclusions that are used as a premises in a continuing chain of reasoning
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
What is controversial premises and conclusions that are controversial on the same grounds that you are arguing them?
I think that the answer is : Begging the question
What are the classifications of ideas in logic?
In logic, ideas are classified as either premises or conclusions. Premises are statements that provide the foundation for an argument, while conclusions are the statements that follow logically from the premises. Additionally, ideas can be classified as true or false based on their correspondence with reality.
What involves one or more reasons presented by a speaker or a writeer to lead the audience or reader to a logical conclusion?
An argument involves one or more reasons presented by a speaker or writer to lead the audience or reader to a logical conclusion. It is a form of persuasive communication where evidence and reasoning are used to support a claim or viewpoint.
When asking your audience to accept controversial premises and conclusions that are controversial on the same grounds that we are arguing are?
Begging the question
Deductive reasoning is stronger than inductive reasoning because it?
draws conclusions based on premises everyone can agree on
What do the conclusions tell about the experiment?
The conclusions tell why the data support or reject the hypothesis.
When these types of words are used in an argument they are indicators that a premise has been made and a conclusion will soon follow?
Words like "because," "since," and "therefore" are indicators of premises and conclusions in arguments. They help link reasons (premises) to conclusions to make a persuasive case. Paying attention to these words can help you discern the structure and flow of an argument.
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
