no because have different jobs that they work with
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
I'm doing the same paper :P
I need the same question answered!:-)
the articles of confederation and the constitution are both the same because they both are written and the difference is that they tell different things. and i dont know but i just wanted to do something so i took a long shot at it
LOL! i had this same question for homework. shame :P
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
VERY different. The Articles of Confederation was the agreements among 13 independent States' the Constitution bound those states into a new nation.
I'm doing the same paper :P
the answer is actually two. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States. It was in effect from 1781 to 1789. In 1789, our second (and current) Constitution went into effect after it was ratified by nine of the 13 states.
The United States has operated under two constitutions. The first, The Articles of Confederation, was in effect from March 1, 1781, when Maryland ratified it. The second, The Constitution, replaced the Articles when it was ratified by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788. The two documents have much in common - they were established by the same people (sometimes literally the same exact people, though mostly just in terms of contemporaries). But they differ more than they do resemble each other, when one looks at the details. Comparing them can give us insight into what the Framers found important in 1781, and what they changed their minds on by 1788.
I need the same question answered!:-)
the articles of confederation and the constitution are both the same because they both are written and the difference is that they tell different things. and i dont know but i just wanted to do something so i took a long shot at it
LOL! i had this same question for homework. shame :P
Well, the Congress of the Confederation was a legislative branch under the Articles of Confederation. So the Constitutional Convention would've still come turned out the way it regularly turned out to be. The states would still have the same powers because the government was under the Articles of Confederation was a weak government anyways.
No, they are the original basic framework for a new country that was deifying England and ready to wage war against their homeland. They would be the opposite of articles of surrender.
· They were established by the same people· Both were the official government of the United States· Both were the laws of the United States government· Both called the nation the United States of America
The name of the government prior to the present one was the same: The United States of America even though it operated under the Articles of Confederation. Article 1 of the Articles of Confederation reads: The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America.