answersLogoWhite

0

Immanuel Kant says no. He gives two 'Categorical Imperatives' that must be followed under all conditions. These are: 1. Perform every act as though it would become a universal law that all sentience would act according to. And 2. Treat all humanity whether in your own person or that of another, always as an end and never as a means only. He allows for no exceptions. He says: if the police come to your door and demand you give up your family, you may fight or run but you may not lie because no person would be willing to live in a world where people lied whenever they wished. He also shows us that no person would choose to be treated as a means to an end, with no consideration of their special status as an independent person with inalienable personal rights and importance.

By the way, he also said that objective determination of right and wrong is impossible for a subjective being. He said it is the will to do the right thing that makes a person ethical. He felt that the two categorical Imperatives stemmed from the will to do the right thing. Kant believed he proved the existence of God because we all have a moral will to maintain our right conduct. It is the Moral Will that is universal and that universal nature infers a common source and a God creator of that common universal nature. The nature of ethical decisions and acts must be explored further in order to understand the full implications of Kant's theses. Kant is a good source for these questions.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is it against the law for journalists to use unethical methods?

While it may not be illegal for a journalist to use unethical methods per se, sometimes using unethical methods end up leading journalists to break the law without them knowing it sometimes but if and when they are investigated for using unethical methods it is found out that they broke the law in the process, they can be held liable for whatever happened for using the unethical methods. But, just because it is unethical sometimes, it is not necessarily illegal.


How were decisions made in Sparta?

They decisions were made by kings .


Why Decisions are made?

Decisions are made to plan for your future.


What possible disadvantage of interest groups does this scenario illustrate?

they sometimes resort to unethical tactics


Different conditions under which decisions are made?

the conditions that decisions are made


What can be inferred from the reading passageThe general gave little thought to human life.The general did not like the other officer.The officer was not a good horseman.Decisions in a time of war sometimes have to be made quickly?

Decisions in a time of war sometimes have to be made quickly.


Was Roman Republic fairer than democracy in Athens?

Fair is a flexible word. Both democracies had their good and bad points. But i both, the assemblies of the citizens made decisions carried out by the Senate/Council. Sometimes bad decisions were made, and the citizens brought 'unfairness' on themselves.


Can you explain the difference between decisions made from the heart vs. decisions made from the soul"?

Decisions made from the heart are based on emotions and personal feelings, while decisions made from the soul are guided by deeper values, beliefs, and intuition.


Is intentionally distorting graphs and charts to deemphasize unfavorable data more or less unethical than intentionally deemphasizing bad news?

Both issues are unethical. They can lead to wrong decisions, can cost the company money and also when the truth comes out people will lose your trust


What group of people made the decisions in the iroquis league?

The council made all the decisions


Who said sometimes you have to accept harsh decisions?

God


Can Decisions in Federal District Court be made by a panel of three judges?

No. Trials in Federal District Court are heard by a single judge, and sometimes a jury.