Immanuel Kant says no. He gives two 'Categorical Imperatives' that must be followed under all conditions. These are: 1. Perform every act as though it would become a universal law that all sentience would act according to. And 2. Treat all humanity whether in your own person or that of another, always as an end and never as a means only. He allows for no exceptions. He says: if the police come to your door and demand you give up your family, you may fight or run but you may not lie because no person would be willing to live in a world where people lied whenever they wished. He also shows us that no person would choose to be treated as a means to an end, with no consideration of their special status as an independent person with inalienable personal rights and importance.
By the way, he also said that objective determination of right and wrong is impossible for a subjective being. He said it is the will to do the right thing that makes a person ethical. He felt that the two categorical Imperatives stemmed from the will to do the right thing. Kant believed he proved the existence of God because we all have a moral will to maintain our right conduct. It is the Moral Will that is universal and that universal nature infers a common source and a God creator of that common universal nature. The nature of ethical decisions and acts must be explored further in order to understand the full implications of Kant's theses. Kant is a good source for these questions.
While it may not be illegal for a journalist to use unethical methods per se, sometimes using unethical methods end up leading journalists to break the law without them knowing it sometimes but if and when they are investigated for using unethical methods it is found out that they broke the law in the process, they can be held liable for whatever happened for using the unethical methods. But, just because it is unethical sometimes, it is not necessarily illegal.
They decisions were made by kings .
Decisions are made to plan for your future.
they sometimes resort to unethical tactics
the conditions that decisions are made
Decisions in a time of war sometimes have to be made quickly.
Fair is a flexible word. Both democracies had their good and bad points. But i both, the assemblies of the citizens made decisions carried out by the Senate/Council. Sometimes bad decisions were made, and the citizens brought 'unfairness' on themselves.
Decisions made from the heart are based on emotions and personal feelings, while decisions made from the soul are guided by deeper values, beliefs, and intuition.
Both issues are unethical. They can lead to wrong decisions, can cost the company money and also when the truth comes out people will lose your trust
The council made all the decisions
God
No. Trials in Federal District Court are heard by a single judge, and sometimes a jury.