Want this question answered?
Socrates disagreed with the Sophists because he believed in the pursuit of objective truth and knowledge, whereas the Sophists believed in the subjective nature of truth and that it could be manipulated for personal gain. Socrates criticized the Sophists for prioritizing rhetoric and persuasive arguments over genuine wisdom and philosophical inquiry.
Socrates disagreed with the Sophists because he believed that they were more focused on winning arguments and manipulating language rather than seeking truth and knowledge. Socrates believed in the pursuit of objective and universal truths through critical thinking and examination of one's own beliefs. He felt that the Sophists were more interested in persuasion and rhetoric for their own personal gain.
Sophists believed that truth and morality were relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, while Socrates believed in absolute truths and that moral values were objective and existed independently of human perception. They also disagreed on the role of education, with sophists focusing on teaching rhetoric and persuasion skills for personal gain, while Socrates emphasized self-knowledge and pursuing virtue for the betterment of one's soul.
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
Socrates believed in absolute truth and objective morality, seeing them as universal and unchanging concepts. In contrast, the Sophists believed that truth and morality were subjective and relative to individuals or societies, leading to the belief that these concepts could be manipulated or changed to suit personal gain or persuasion. Socrates argued for the pursuit of knowledge and virtue as essential to understanding the good and the just, while the Sophists emphasized persuasion and the ability to argue different viewpoints regardless of their truthfulness.
What tell me please
What tell me please
disagree; correct
disagree; correct
that sophists thought that knowledge was a way to improve ur life and Socrates thought that there was an absolute right or wrong
Socrates disagreed with the Sophists because he believed in the pursuit of objective truth and knowledge, whereas the Sophists believed in the subjective nature of truth and that it could be manipulated for personal gain. Socrates criticized the Sophists for prioritizing rhetoric and persuasive arguments over genuine wisdom and philosophical inquiry.
Socrates disagreed with the Sophists because he believed that they were more focused on winning arguments and manipulating language rather than seeking truth and knowledge. Socrates believed in the pursuit of objective and universal truths through critical thinking and examination of one's own beliefs. He felt that the Sophists were more interested in persuasion and rhetoric for their own personal gain.
Sophists believed that truth and morality were relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, while Socrates believed in absolute truths and that moral values were objective and existed independently of human perception. They also disagreed on the role of education, with sophists focusing on teaching rhetoric and persuasion skills for personal gain, while Socrates emphasized self-knowledge and pursuing virtue for the betterment of one's soul.
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
Socrates believed in absolute truth and objective morality, seeing them as universal and unchanging concepts. In contrast, the Sophists believed that truth and morality were subjective and relative to individuals or societies, leading to the belief that these concepts could be manipulated or changed to suit personal gain or persuasion. Socrates argued for the pursuit of knowledge and virtue as essential to understanding the good and the just, while the Sophists emphasized persuasion and the ability to argue different viewpoints regardless of their truthfulness.
Disagree
I disagree, but let's agree to disagree. Disagreeing with me can be tricky, but try not to get sticky. Disagree with grace, maintain your own pace.