Yes, otherwise our future would be bleak, i think we should use one of my sayings, the past has overcome us, but the future will overwhelm us. I couldn't agree more with you.
*cough Especially Australia cough*
The future tense is will agree.
Yes because their are so many countries that can't agree on stupid things, and have to take it to that kind of level.
According to me you should go for that future where you have interest, because today what is working it is not necessary that it will work in the future. I agree - you can't predict the future, so pick something that you will like doing for the rest of your life.
No. You should determine whether you agree with the info that is presented.
Should or agree
No, every country should be free to choose they type of government they want. Democracy does not necessarily bring prosperity.
No I do not agree that all street children have no future because children are seen as the future and children are born with talents and gifts which if they are interested in making a brighter future for themselves they will discover and use them to make better themselves.
Just what it says. He suggests that you should not lend to anyone or to borrow from them. Whether you agree with this depends on your own views.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was concerned with the admission of the Kansas and Nebraska territories into the USA. Since the two sections could not agree whether these future states should be slave or free, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois suggested that the people of each state should vote on it. The result was Bleeding Kansas.
Do you agree or disagree Countries should provide free healthcare to their citizens even if it means that the latest medical technology cannot be used for treatment because they are to expensive. Provide me a special answers in 250 words.
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
We all agree that they should not.