His greatest error was trying to use sophisticated arguments when the jurors were common people selected by ballot, who were never going to understand the types of arguments which were appropriate for his intellectual students.
We would therefore have to conclude that he knew he was for the high jump, and was using the trial as a teaching platform for the audience rather than trying to influence the jurors.
And after his conviction, when he gave his proposed punishment after the prosecution had proposed death, he gave a facetious alternative instead of saying banishment. The jury was required to select one or the other of the two proposed punishments - so by proposing he be rewarded rather than punished, he automatically acquiesced to the death proposal.
So we have to conclude that he wished to die rather than leave Athens to see his few remaining years out without the intellectual stimulation of subverting the youth of Athens to promote his aims of getting rid of democracy and changing the popular social system.
So in agreeing or disagreeing with the way he handled it, you have to work out whether you agree with his right to choose his own path, or whether you want to dictate to him what you would like him to have done and why your objectives are better than his.
Socrates' main goal in his trial was to defend his philosophy and way of life, rather than seeking to escape punishment. He wanted to uphold his principles of questioning authority and encouraging critical thinking, even in the face of potential death.
Socrates' trial was a reaction to the political and social instability in Athens at the time. His critical questioning of traditional beliefs and his association with political figures perceived as threats to democracy led to him being seen as a subversive influence. The trial provided a way for his enemies to remove him from society and restore a sense of stability.
Socrates believed that true knowledge involves understanding the underlying reasons or causes of things, not just having information. In this sense, knowing "why" something is the way it is can provide a deeper and more meaningful understanding than mere factual knowledge. So, in that context, yes, I agree with Socrates.
It was the other way around. Plato was Socrates' student. Virtually everything we know about Socrates comes from the writings of Plato in which he describes what Socrates taught and how he taught.
The Socratic method is named after the Greek philosopher Socrates, who used it as a way of teaching and engaging in philosophical dialogue. Socrates' method involved questioning assumptions, seeking underlying principles, and encouraging critical thinking in his interlocutors.
Socrates' main goal in his trial was to defend his philosophy and way of life, rather than seeking to escape punishment. He wanted to uphold his principles of questioning authority and encouraging critical thinking, even in the face of potential death.
Socrates' trial was a reaction to the political and social instability in Athens at the time. His critical questioning of traditional beliefs and his association with political figures perceived as threats to democracy led to him being seen as a subversive influence. The trial provided a way for his enemies to remove him from society and restore a sense of stability.
Socrates believed that true knowledge involves understanding the underlying reasons or causes of things, not just having information. In this sense, knowing "why" something is the way it is can provide a deeper and more meaningful understanding than mere factual knowledge. So, in that context, yes, I agree with Socrates.
No he wasn't, he just didn't agree with the way they went about the laws. His main themes in his plays were "gods law is more important than man's"
It was the other way around. Plato was Socrates' student. Virtually everything we know about Socrates comes from the writings of Plato in which he describes what Socrates taught and how he taught.
Socrates was killed this way
that sophists thought that knowledge was a way to improve ur life and Socrates thought that there was an absolute right or wrong
How did the way in which Truman handled the Korean crisis affect the powers of the presidency
REMEMBER - YOU CHOSE to be tried by the judge alone (bench trial). Just because he didn't render a decision that you liked is not grounds to appeal the verdict. However, If you can cite something improper in the way the prosec;ution was handled, or mis-conduct on the part of the judge, you can file an appeal of the way the trial was conducted with the Appeals Court. (re-read the first sentence!)
By definition, Socrates was not a god. He was a mortal human being, albeit a brilliant one. He may seem that way sometimes, though.
=The biggest change during the great depression was the way money is handled. The way money was handled was way different then it is now.=
Why is it important that the eck tracing be handled carefully and not be allow to smear or be folded in any way