Want this question answered?
The Plymouth Pilgrims went to the Americas because where they came from ,all had to believe in a certain religion.The Pilgrims did not believe or want to believe in this certain religion.This is why the Pilgrims moved,so that they could believe in they're own religions
President Monroe set this foreign policy that said he would not interfere in the affairs of European nations or colonies in the Americas he also warned Europeans not to screw with our crap either.and if you don't believe me dang you look it up retard
spain
The Europeans didn't believe Marco Polo, because the black dead was occurring in Europe. They didn't believe that there is a place in harmony when massive of people are dying in their continent.
I believe that was diarrhea.
Europeans brought deadly diseases to the Americas that Native Americans were not immune to. This killed more natives than war.
There were a number of diseases that followed Spanish colonization of the Americas, one of the most devastating of which was small pox. Whether this came with Columbus or later is not known. Conversely, many believe that Columbus' crew brought syphilis back to Europe on their return from the Americas.
I believe its Aconcagua in South America America was dubbed the 'new world' by the europeans. This (I think) being the Highest peak in the Americas is the ceiling of the new world.
Historically, Europeans often held prejudiced and racist beliefs about Africans, viewing them as inferior in terms of culture, intelligence, and civilization. These beliefs were often used to justify the exploitation and colonization of African people and their lands. These harmful stereotypes persist in various forms to this day.
Europeans descended from jews and then the bloodline ended up in North America
benefited the nation as a whole! :)
I believe so
Hgvnhfgh8ffjjyfxyuu
101%
Scholars believe the first people who arrived in the Americas came from Russia. They believe these people crossed the great ice bridge.
Certainly. Historically, there was the "Right to Conquest" which was a pervasive idea in political thought. The idea was that it was natural for any country or state to grow and control more territory as it grew stronger. This allowed weaker states to dissolve in place of ones that were better run, a bureaucratic version of "survival of the fittest". The "Right to Conquest" prevailed as the dominant theory of nation-building until the mid-1800s when people started bringing up the concept of self-sovereignty and ethnic nationalism, which held the idea that people should govern themselves even if they are not the most powerful in the world. This view of state sovereignty has become dominant today and the Right to Conquest is seen as incorrect. Since the colonization of the Americas existed well within the Right to Conquest Period, the Europeans believed that they had a natural prerogative to conquer the vast territories of the Americas and subjugate them to their will.
I believe that the city and community of San Francisco benefited from it personally. It is a national landmark that automatically makes you think of the city. It adds to the beauty of it.