Yes, use the apostrophe.
Example:
Outcome's reception will be held at noon.
It means a transaction of some form between a company and a company rather than a company and a private customer.
Besloten Vennootschap is the Dutch terminology for a private limited liability company. The company is owned by shareholders, and the company's shares are privately registered and not freely transferable. The phrase means "secluded partnership" or "private partnership" and it is the most common form of enterprise in the Netherlands.
All large companies have "pilot" or experimental companies which may or may not develop into something else. If this small subsidary embarasses, grows-up or other reason, the owning company may openly or secretly, willingly or not, to then legally be seen to separate from the parent company. The other spun-off company is created when ex-employees of the parent company legally create a seemingly or real independent company.
What you are describing is a trademark. A trademark can be a word, phrase, symbol, logo, design or image. Companies do not buy the trademark but register it so no one else can use it without their permission.
A synonym for the phrase 'next best phrase' is very simple you if you want a synonym phrase then the proper answer would be take the middle word which in this case would be 'best' and switch the words around and find a synonm for alternative which would be thing so your synonym would be 'best next thing'
The apostrophe in "two's" indicates possession or contraction. It is used to show that something belongs to or is associated with "two" (e.g., "two's company," "two's a crowd").
No, there is no apostrophe in the phrase "21st century."
Yes, the phrase "This Year's Honorees" does need an apostrophe. The apostrophe indicates possession or belonging, showing that the honorees belong to or are associated with "This Year."
The phrase "Here's to Harry" does require an apostrophe in "here's." This is because "here's" is a contraction of two different words, here and is, where the apostrophe takes the place of the missing space and the missing i from is. The "here" that "is" (being offered) to Harry in this phrase is not explicitly stated but is understood by the context to be, for example, an honoring by a "toast." Without the apostrophe, we would have heres, which is not the word meant in this phrase. (Heres is actually a legal term meaning "an heir.")
Glasses' rim.
Yes. McCain has ownership over his place of employment. An apostrophe is required.
Yes as it is the possessive form. As the phrase is referring to just one of the names in the partnership, the apostrophe should be placed thus:- PARTNER'S NAME If instead you had been asking about all of the names in the partnership, the apostrophe should be placed thus:- PARTNERS' NAMES
The apostrophe in O'Neal and O'Sullivan is actually a mark of elision -- an omission of one or more sounds in a word or phrase.
The apostrophe would be placed in "you'd" as a contraction for "you would".
Because that is short for 'of the clock', a phrase which is not used anymore.
The phrase apostrophe for omission sounds like a teacher's comment when you misused an apostrophe. If so, it just means remove the apostrophe.Wrong: The boy's bikes were red.Right: The boys' bikes were red.
Yes, in the phrase "last year's party," you should use an apostrophe to show possession. The apostrophe indicates that the party belongs to last year.