Want this question answered?
In theory, justice is based on fairness. Injustice should have equal consequences. By respecting the rights of others we are upholding the consequence for said injustice. Again theoretically, this should provide amends and a sense of closure for those for whom who's respect was violated. Through justice we are respecting the rights of others by acknowledging (in the United States at least) an individual's right for the 'inalienable right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness'. Ideally, when the respect and rights of others are compromised, justice should prevail.
5 Circumstances under which the government should intervene on theReligious rights of others:-should not affect the faith or beliefs of other human beingsShould not lead the practitioner into degeneration of humanitarianismShould not force others to join their religionShould not be based on radical fanaticismShould not be against the law of nature
Political injustice is being discriminated as a result of disagreeing with various political stands. For instance, being arrested for opposing some government policies is a political injustice.
no
no
With outrage, like any human should.
Not just Muslims. Jews and Christians are also against bullying. The simplest way to put it, from the Islamic tradition , is the saying: "God has made injustice forbidden upon Himself, and He has also made it forbidden between you (the people). So do not commit injustice". And: "He who wishes that God will be merciful to him should be merciful to others".
The circumstances surrounding the accident remain unclear.
Rule #22 in The Rules of Golf says when the ball interferes or assists an opponents ball.
Generally, such information should be kept private.In very rare circumstances it may be revealed, if it presents a hazard to others, for instance.
.What are the circumstances?
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" - Martin Luther King.