0
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Why is it important that scientist know and accept their limitations?
why is it important that scientists know and accept their limitations?
When would scientists accept a theory?
probably when you can prove it
How is evolution scientifically disputed?
It is NOT scientifically disputed as the overwhelming number of scientists accept evolutionary theory. Those scientists, and others, that do not accept the theory do so for religiously ideological reasons, though they try to rationalize this by pseudo scientific proposals.
Can evolution be denied?
Any proposition can be denied by those who do not wish to accept it, no matter how strong the evidence is. However, evolution can not rationally be denied. Scientists say they regard it as fact.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Do Jewish scientists believe in genesis or the big bang theory?
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Is it true or false the Scientists accept ideas from the past but will revise them when new evidence is discovered?
true
Why did many scientists not accept the early theiories of continental drifts?
Alfred Wegener did not have the "HOW" factor- because of no evidence on the process, they could not believe his theory.
Which of the following provides evidence that led many scientists to accept Darwin's theory of natural selection instead of earlier theories?
Similarities among embryos.
Why is providing evidence to support your position an important part of building an argument?
Providing evidence to support your position is important because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to your argument. Evidence demonstrates that your position is based on facts and logic rather than unsupported opinions. It also helps your audience better understand and accept your perspective.
Why did scientists in 1915 not accept wegeners idea of continental drift?
people in 1915 thought that he was crazy, and back theen they didn't have the technology to support Wegner's idea.
What do scientists think about the theory of evolution?
The overwhelming majority of scientists accept the theory of evolution by natural selection. Any scientists that do not accept the theory usually do so for religious reasons.
Will the judge accept money orders as proof of child support payment?
Maybe. It depends on all the other evidence, both oral and documentary, that is presented.
How can the Scientific Revolution be seen as a conflict between authority and evidence?
The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.
What is the evidence that dinosaurs lived?
Their fossilized bones and tracks is the evidence we accept.
Why is it important that scientist know and accept their limitations?
why is it important that scientists know and accept their limitations?
