Yes, a comma should be used after "hours" in this sentence. It should be written as: "At 1600 hours, she arrived at the airport."
No, the correct phrasing would be "When 'you' arrived, she had already left." By adding the comma after "arrived," the sentence is clearer and reads more smoothly.
No, a comma is not necessary after "Inc" in a sentence. "Inc" is an abbreviation for "Incorporated," and it is typically used without a comma following it in a sentence.
add a comma after the semicolon.
In general, when "but" is used as a conjunction, a comma is not needed before it. However, if the phrase following "but" is an independent clause, then a comma is typically placed before "but."
noooooooooooooooooo actually, there is a specific comma rule that pertains to this - A comma would be used both before and after the designations of "Jr." or "Sr.," as long as the sentence continues. If the designation is at the end of the sentence, then a comma is used only before it.
add a comma after the semicolon.
Yes, after "next."
A comma splice occurs when two independent clauses are connected with only a comma. To identify a comma splice, look for two complete sentences joined together with a comma without a coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, etc.) or a semicolon. Fix a comma splice by adding a coordinating conjunction, replacing the comma with a semicolon, or using a period to make separate sentences.
Yes after arrived
A comma splice is when two independent clauses are joined by a comma alone, which is grammatically incorrect. A run-on sentence, on the other hand, is when two independent clauses are joined without any punctuation or conjunction, creating a lengthy or confusing sentence. Both errors can lead to confusion and should be avoided in writing.
no. if but before is a sentence on its on and after but is a sentence on its own then put a comma before but.
noooooooooooooooooo actually, there is a specific comma rule that pertains to this - A comma would be used both before and after the designations of "Jr." or "Sr.," as long as the sentence continues. If the designation is at the end of the sentence, then a comma is used only before it.
A comma before "which" depends on whether it introduces a nonessential clause. If the information following "which" is necessary for the sentence's meaning, no comma is needed. However, if the clause is nonessential, a comma before "which" is appropriate.
Comma's are the hardest punctuation mark to place in a sentence. A comma can be placed after instead at the beginning of a sentence if the sentence is a continuation of the subject in the one before it.
In general, a comma is used before coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or, so, for, nor, yet) when joining independent clauses, in lists, after introductory phrases, and to offset appositives or non-essential information. Be mindful not to overuse commas, as they can disrupt the flow of your sentence.
The sentence, "She was born in Kansas in 1782," does not require any comma. The meaning of the sentence is perfectly clear without one. I'm not aware of any rule that automatically requires a comma following a place name. There is, I believe, a rule requiring a comma if the sentence had referred to "Wichita, Kansas." (Of course, one would have to overlook the fact that there was no Wichita, Kansas in 1782.) In the sentence within parenteses, some people place a second comma after Kansas (e.g. ... no Wichita, Kansas, in 1782).
Yes, there should be a comma after the word "because" in the sentence "Walking is often prescribed for seniors because it is less stressful on their joints" to separate the dependent clause "because it is less stressful on their joints" from the independent clause "Walking is often prescribed for seniors."