The Vision's TSi trim code always incorporated the 3.5 liter engine (not the smaller 3.3 liter engine). Technically, the 3.5L engine is "considered" an interference engine by sources I've read, however in practicality, it may as well be considered a non-interference engine.
This means that when the timing belt breaks when the engine is in operation, allowing the valves to function out of sync with the pistons, no valve damage is expected. (You would normally expect valve damage in this situation because the pistons would smack the free running valves, e.g. the valve would be open--lower into the chamber--when the piston might be at full up stroke.)
No , it is not an interference engine ( according to the Gates website , they make timing belts etc . )
The 1993 Eagle Vision equipped with the 3.5 Liter V6 has a timing belt. The belt MUST be replaced at 105,000 miles or 10 years. The cam belt also drives the water pump, so replace the pump at the same time to save on labor costs later on when the pump fails. Warning: This engine is an INTERFERENCE engine. If the belt breaks, serious engine damage will occur. The 3.3L has a chain. No maintenance neccessary.
No, the 3.0 V6 in a 1993 Mercury Villager is NOT and interference engine.
no it is not
Chrysler did not manufacture an Eagle Vision in 1991, that line ran from 1993 to 1997.
no it is not
It is a non interference engine.
Yes , the 2.3 liter 4 cylinder in a 1993 Ford Ranger is a non-interference engine
The SOHC ( IS NOT ) an interference engine ( 8 valves ) The DOHC ( IS ) an interference engine ( 16 valves ) for the 1.6 liter 4 cylinder
It is a NON - interference engine , according to the Gates website ( they make timing belts etc. )
Yes it does
The 1993 Mitsubishi Eclipse with the 1.8 liter engine is not on the list of cars with interference engines. The 1989-1998 2.0 Galant Eclipse cars were built with interference engines.