No country uses biological weapons of any type at this time.
Th Chemical Weapons Convention was ratified by Morocco at 29.04.1997.
When biological weapons have been used the outcome has been massive death and biological destruction. It affects all things in the area used. When Hessian used biological weapons against his people whole populations died. Since it is biological it stays in the environment and can mutate so it has been agreed not to use them.
Yes, that's correct. The U.S. has laws and policies, such as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 and the Biological Weapons Convention, that prohibit the development, production, and use of biological agents or toxins for hostile purposes. These measures are in place to prevent the use of biological weapons and protect public safety.
Not everyone is going to agree about the use of biological weapons. Here are some opinions:The use of biological weapons is absolutely wrong, especially on a moral level. Though the use of biological organisms that occur naturally would be bad enough, in many cases it is likely that the organisms have been genetically modified. Not only is it likely that those organisms would kill millions of people, releasing them into the environment could have other disastrous consequences that are not yet known.
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
Julian Perry Robinson has written: 'Public Health Response to Biological and Chemical Weapons' 'The effects of weapons on ecosystems' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare, Environmental aspects, Environmental aspects of Biological warfare, Environmental aspects of Chemical warfare, Environmental aspects of Military weapons, Environmental aspects of Nuclear weapons, Environmental aspects of War, Military weapons, Nuclear weapons, War 'The United States binary nerve-gas programme' -- subject(s): Asphyxiating and poisonous Gases, Chemical weapons, Military policy, War use 'Chemical and biological warfare developments, 1985' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare
Terrorists often use bombs and bullets. They also use biological and chemical weapons.
The use of biological agents, such as pathogenic organisms or agricultural pests, for terrorist purposes. OR Terrorism using the weapons of biological warfare. OR Terrorism that relies on spreading diseases, such as anthrax and smallpox. OR The use of biological agents as weapons of terror. Anthrax bacteria are one such agent, while smallpox is considered one of the more likely lethal viruses that could serve as a weapon of bioterror.
Biological weapons have a great capacity for backlash. As it is used against the enemy, it can spread and kill the very people that released the 'killer germ' in the first place. These types of weapons have worldwide laws as to their use, but it takes just one government to violate those rules and release a deadly agent that could devistate the globe.
No, both are legal weapons for nations to use in war. Only chemical and biological weapons are prohibited by international law (although that has not stopped certain countries from using them).
While no biological weapons were used in Europe during World War II, they were used in Asia, especially by the Japanese. They used cholera, anthrax, typhoid, plague, and dysentery against the Chinese.