Want this question answered?
Yes, but not in the way we think of flushing toilets. In private houses, a bucket or two of water was used to flush away the waste and prevent odor. In the public toilets latrines, there was a stream of running water beneath the seats to flush away waste.
low flush toilets use less water.
Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.Yes, Roman plumbing was advanced for its time. They had flush toilets and running water in some homes. The central heating was delivered by plumbing and the baths had various temperatures of water. Although they did not have the modern technology as we have, their plumbing was advanced for its time.
no
It depends on what type of flush you use. Old style single flush toilets use around 11 litres of water per flush, older dual flush toilets use 4.5 or 9 litres per flush, while modern water efficient dual flush toilets use 3 or 6 litres per flush.
Toilets to flush clockwise in the north. However, it is not due to the rotation of the earth as many people believe. It is because of the way water is jetted into them.
All of the public toilets built by the Romans had a running water system to flush away waste. They also had a trough of running water which contained the "tersoria" or sponge-sticks for personal hygiene. The seats could be of various materials, such as wood or stone or even marble.
Low flow toilets use 1.6 gallons per flush. The new(2014) ones are 1.28
Generally, modern toilets are required to be low flow, which is 1.6 gallons (6L) per flush. Older toilets were 3 gpf (11L). Modern toilets vary in the amount of water required to flush them, from 6L to 3L. Some have a dual flush system allowing solids (faeces) to be flushed with a full volume flush, say of 6 or 4.5L, and liquids (urine) to be flushed with a smaller volume flush of about 3L. It is not possible to flush properly a toilet with less water than that with which it was designed to be flushed. Low volume flush toilets have been designed to work efficiently with a smaller volume of water.
Dual flush toilets use less water than traditional toilets. That means, less waste water to be treated. It doesn't reallyhelp the environment as we live in a biosphere and water is a renewable resource which is very easy to treat. It's really more greenwash.
No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".No. Roman toilets required, as ours do, running water. This was not possible at roadside. If nature called, they "used the bushes".
so they can flush toilets,provide drinking fountains and taps