Want this question answered?
No. Such conflict was basically part of the Cold War between NATO forces on one side, and Chinese and Soviet forces on the other.
They were both created to coordinate the armed forces of their respective countries, with some standardization of military procedure and equipment, in order to fight as one large force instead of several independent forces in the event of war.
U.S. forces entered in 2001, but NATO didn't enter until 2003.The U.S. forces are apart of, and are one of the main leaders of NATO, but technically NATO did not enter at the same time the U.S. forces did.
5.56mm x 45mm (5.56 is the diameter of the buller, 45mm is the length of the brass casing). NATO implies that this is THE 5.56mm round used by NATO forces. Similar to 7.62mm x 51mm NATO is the standard .30 caliber round use by NATO forces.
NATO has deployed air forces over Albania, Montenegro, and Sloveina
The UN or United Nations I believe is just a conference for all the countries to get together and I think NATO or NATO forces are I think the allied forces or something like that like US, UK etc...
To counter the Soviet's Warsaw Pact forces in Europe. WP was their NATO.
It joined NATO after 1990
neither UN or NATO took part in Vietnam
Communist
The technicality is in the title within your question. The US President is the civilian "commander in Chief" of the US Armed Forces as stated in the US Constitution, however, during NATO supported conflicts, in the past, there has been a military position of Supreme Commander of NATO forces, which reports to the US President and NATO.
See the list on website: Korean War