No. The example of it being like our Solar system is strictly for show. The motion and position of the outer shell electrons is unknowable. We have just recently been able to discern the core of an atom.
The Bohr atomic model is similar to solar system.
The best model to describe atomic structure is the Rutherford model
The atomic model in which electrons orbit the nucleus the way that planets orbit the sun is called the Bohr atom. We now know that atoms are really not very much like that at all, and electrons do not orbit the nucleus, they form shells, rather than orbits.
This model contain a central atomic nucleus surrounded by a cloud of fast moving electrons.
To explain atomic emission spectra. Using the Bohr Model of a hydrogen atom, deriving the frequency of these emission lines is almost trivial. Without the Bohr Model, deriving them is impossible. Also, the "classical" model of electrons in an atom, acting like planets around a nucleus, would result in complete collapse of such an atom in a small fraction of a second.
No.
The Bohr atomic model is similar to solar system.
The best model to describe atomic structure is the Rutherford model
The atomic model in which electrons orbit the nucleus the way that planets orbit the sun is called the Bohr atom. We now know that atoms are really not very much like that at all, and electrons do not orbit the nucleus, they form shells, rather than orbits.
This model contain a central atomic nucleus surrounded by a cloud of fast moving electrons.
He contriubuted to modern science with his model for atomic theory which he described was similar to the rings of saturn and he descibed that in his model of atomic theory. Hantaro Nagaoka was a great man and and he contributed alot of tings to modern science i cant name them all but he contributed alot of things to modern science
To explain atomic emission spectra. Using the Bohr Model of a hydrogen atom, deriving the frequency of these emission lines is almost trivial. Without the Bohr Model, deriving them is impossible. Also, the "classical" model of electrons in an atom, acting like planets around a nucleus, would result in complete collapse of such an atom in a small fraction of a second.
To explain atomic emission spectra. Using the Bohr Model of a hydrogen atom, deriving the frequency of these emission lines is almost trivial. Without the Bohr Model, deriving them is impossible. Also, the "classical" model of electrons in an atom, acting like planets around a nucleus, would result in complete collapse of such an atom in a small fraction of a second.
Before Rutherford, scientists assumed that the atom was a single particle. Rutherford presented his revolutionary, physical atomic model that suggested an atom consists of a central charge (the term 'nucleus' was coined after Rutherford's model was presented) that is surrounded, presumably, by a cloud of orbiting electrons. He showed that most of an atom's mass was located in the atom's nucleus. Rutherford's model was later improved upon by Niels Bohr, father of the Bohr-model. Rutherford made no connection to an element's atomic number and the number of protons within an atom's nucleus; however, his atomic model paved the way for the discovery of this correlation only a couple years after his model was designed.
Like all the inert gases it is in atomic form. No molecules like Ar2 are possible. Atom
The atomic model in which electrons orbit the nucleus the way that planets orbit the sun is called the Bohr atom. We now know that atoms are really not very much like that at all, and electrons do not orbit the nucleus, they form shells, rather than orbits.
Niels Bohr suggested a planetary model for the atom.