No.
Unless something belongs to the beads.
99% of the time you use the apostrophe for one of two reasons:
Possessive "this thing belongs to it"
David's Car
the cat's milk
or Contractive "I can't be bothered to type"
David is a man = David's a man
the cat is too fat = the cat's too fat
"The beads are on a string" no need - you just have some beads.
"that is the bead's string" Possessive (and odd)
"that's the jar of beads" Contractive (that is)
I am does not need an apostrophe. It is only when you make it into a contraction by dropping the a that you need the apostrophe. It becomes I'm in that situation.
No. The Cannons doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, because plurals do not need an apostrophe.
As a plural, for more than one dad; no, does not need an apostrophe. As a possessive, as in the item belonging to dad, then yes, it does need an apostrophe.
No. Harringtons doesn't need an apostrophe.
I am does not need an apostrophe. It is only when you make it into a contraction by dropping the a that you need the apostrophe. It becomes I'm in that situation.
No, Korean language does not use apostrophes in its writing system.
No. The Cannons doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, Christmas Eve does not need an apostrophe.
No, because plurals do not need an apostrophe.
No, there shouldn't be an apostrophe in "horses" as it is a plural noun. The sentence is correct as "the horses stalls are clean."
As a plural, for more than one dad; no, does not need an apostrophe. As a possessive, as in the item belonging to dad, then yes, it does need an apostrophe.
No. Harringtons doesn't need an apostrophe.
The plural "Thursdays" doesn't need an apostrophe.
Lost wages doesn't need an apostrophe.
If someone is making jewelry then the number of beads they might need for a necklace will vary upon the size of beads and the length of the necklace. It is up to the maker because no exact number can be given here.
No, ours does not need an apostrophe (ever).The piano at the church had been ours.