No, however Congress decides whether or not to get involved in conflict.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
The faction in the Russian Civil War fought for control of Russia after the Bolsheviks ousted the Provisional Government. The Red forces fought for one reason, which was to retain control once they had seized control of the country. The White Forces fought for various reasons. Some factions of the White Forces fought to oust the Bolsheviks and reinstate the tsarist monarchy. Some White Forces fought to oust the Bolsheviks and institute a constitutional democratic government. Some White Forces fought to oust the Bolsheviks and institute a military dictatorship. Then there were the Green Forces, which seem to be forgotten. They were anarchists, but not in the sense of a lawless society. They fought just to be left alone by any Russian government.
An air superiority is an accepted dominance in the air of one side's forces over another during a military campaign.
Congress passed the acts over his veto. (APEX)
not so much that you can get kicked out, but that you can apply to get out because of it. Once you make over a certain amount it removes much of the militaries control over you.
congress has the power to declare war, the president commands the armed forces
congress has the power to declare war, the president commands the armed forces
Congress has the power to declare war, while the president commands the armed forces.
Congress has the power to declare war, raise and fund the military, and regulate its organization and conduct. The president, as commander-in-chief, has the authority to command and control the military forces, make tactical decisions, and deploy troops. However, decisions to commit troops to war and engage in combat are shared powers between the president and Congress.
true
The Congress has the ultimate control over the President's military power. However, the President is the supreme commander of all US military forces and can order military action such as air strikes or even armed intervention into a foreign country, and this is where disputes may arise with Congress. Congress controls the purse strings and so any unauthorized military action must be done with military supplies that are already on hand and so must be relatively limited and short-lived unless Congress agrees to authorize additional funds. Such authorization is likely to provoke resistance and debate in Congress. It is especially irksome if the President starts a war that is hard to get out of gracefully or safely for the troops involved and thus more of less forces Congress to support. .
congress does have complet control over the territories as it states in the constitution.READ THE CONSTITUTION!!
no, they would use their own security forces (MPs) for any trouble requiring a bunch of guys with assault rifles. how ever if the military turns over control to you maybe but unlikely
The combatant commander in the region where US forces are deployed maintains operational control and authority over those forces. This ensures that the forces are effectively coordinated and their actions align with the overall objectives of the mission. The combatant commander is responsible for the planning, employment, and direction of military operations in their area of responsibility.
Congress was given control over trade between the states.
The Constitution gives both the executive and legislative branches authority over certain aspects of the military. It says that the President is the commander and chief of the military, while congress is responsible for funding and providing for the upkeep of the military.
Congress.