That is true. Science tries to make sense of what is observed, to explain the universe in which we live. Until you make an observation, there is nothing to explain.
No
While many scientific methods do start with observations, not all do because some approaches may begin with a hypothesis or theoretical framework that guides the research. In fields like mathematics or theoretical physics, ideas can be developed without direct observation. Additionally, in experimental science, researchers might first formulate a question or problem based on existing knowledge before making observations. Thus, the starting point can vary depending on the discipline and the specific research context.
Yes, in direct observation, every individual in the population is counted to determine the population size accurately. This method requires physically counting or seeing each member of the population. It is usually appropriate for smaller populations or groups that can be easily observed and counted.
I think that it limits what a scientist can study b/c it does cannot talk or explain its past which makes it unfair for the scientist although we do know about some of its past we would love to learn more.It can farther limit by not showing a reaction or a difference.We have to always look precisely and thoroghly. Save
Yes. Every Java class can have a main method
Yes - in Java, every class has this method, which is inherited from the Object class. Often, the inherited method does nothing particularly useful, but you can override it with your own implementation.
Geologists are likely to make the observation that land is spreading out more and more every year.
Geologists are likely to make the observation that land is spreading out more and more every year.
a problem or a rivalry
Every Friday at sundown
the lab
yours didn't