0
Yes and no. The general concept of judicial review remains the same, but the US Supreme Court's constitutional interpretations tend to change over time as the composition of the court changes. Some factors that influence decision-making include majority ideology, interpretive approach, constitutional amendments, current federal statutes, established precedents, current social and political context, trends in state courts, and so on.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the age and legal qualifications of the judicial branch of the US government?
There are no constitutional qualifications for becoming a judge or justice in the Judicial Branch; however, there are informal qualification that change over time.
The supreme court may use its powers of judicial review to declare unconstitutional what?
The US Supreme Court can use the power of judicial review to declare Acts of Congress (laws) and Executive Orders unconstitutional, but only if the constitutionality of a law or order is challenged in a case the Court has under review. The petitioner (plaintiff) must submit one or more questions to the Court regarding the constitutionality of a statute/order that is directly relevant to the case before the Court is authorized to make a determination.
Why is the Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison the most important of all time?
it established the power of judicial review
Which of these is a factor that contributes to culture change over time?
What is a factor that contributes to cultural change over time? Literature review has identified a set of factors that are able to trigger cultural changes. These factors causing cultural change have been found as leadership change, technological developments, mergers and acquisitions and others.
Why wasn't judicial review seen as a big deal at the time of the Marbury v Madison case?
Judicial review is a carryover from British common law and was already an established practice in the American courts. A Circuit Court declared an Act of Congress unconstitutional in the 1790s, and they simply rewrote the law without disputing the court's authority. Most people didn't consider the exercise of judicial review a threat to the balance of power in government.
What is the significance of Marbury v Maddison in 1803?
This was the first time that the Supreme Court had declared an act of Congress unconstitutional Marbury v Madison helped to define the boundary between the judicial and executive branches of the United States. The significant thing about the Marbury v Madison case was the recognition of Judicial review.
What would've happened without the Marbury vs Madison case?
There probably would have been a series of court cases over what branch of government has the right of judicial review. Many historians believe the "Founding Fathers" had intended for the federal courts to have the power of judicial review. But even after the Marbury decision, many who supported the theory of "states' rights" continued to argue that the states rightly had that power according to their interpretation of the Constitution. It took a Civil War to uphold once and for all time, the supremacy of the Federal government including its power of judicial review.
How have valleys changed?
How have valleys change over time?How have valleys change over time?How have valleys change over time?
How does the Moon's shape change over time?
How did the dirction of the moon change over time? How did the dirction of the moon change over time?
Change over time is referred to as?
A change over time is often referred to as a gradual change.
Populations change over time due to the process of?
Do Friends Change Over Time?
Yes, friends do and will change over time. Every person changes over time.
