If you wanted to say "nieces" as a plural, such as "I have two nieces", then it wouldn't need an apostrophe. If you wanted to say something like "My niece's teddybear", showing singular possession, then you would need an apostrophe.
The word nieces is a plural noun. If you want to use it as a plural possessive noun then put an apostrophe at the end - nieces'
My nieces' husbands are both doctors.
I am does not need an apostrophe. It is only when you make it into a contraction by dropping the a that you need the apostrophe. It becomes I'm in that situation.
No. The Cannons doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, because plurals do not need an apostrophe.
As a plural, for more than one dad; no, does not need an apostrophe. As a possessive, as in the item belonging to dad, then yes, it does need an apostrophe.
No. Harringtons doesn't need an apostrophe.
I am does not need an apostrophe. It is only when you make it into a contraction by dropping the a that you need the apostrophe. It becomes I'm in that situation.
No. The Cannons doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, Christmas Eve does not need an apostrophe.
No, because plurals do not need an apostrophe.
As a plural, for more than one dad; no, does not need an apostrophe. As a possessive, as in the item belonging to dad, then yes, it does need an apostrophe.
No. Harringtons doesn't need an apostrophe.
The plural "Thursdays" doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, Korean language does not use apostrophes in its writing system.
No, "Doc Adams" does not need an apostrophe unless it is possessive, such as "Doc Adams's bag."
Lost wages doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, there shouldn't be an apostrophe in "horses" as it is a plural noun. The sentence is correct as "the horses stalls are clean."
No I need help