no
That the substance is dangerous & explosive.
Radium is strongly radioactive.
Boron is neither explosive nor radioactive. It is a chemical element that is found in nature and is commonly used in various applications, including as a neutron absorber in nuclear reactors and as an ingredient in some types of explosives, but it is not inherently explosive or radioactive on its own.
yes it is
NO --------------- I know of no pure carbon forms that are explosive (maybe there is some strained crystal structures). Though carbon could be explosive if a fine dispersion of it in air was ignited. Also acetylene and particularly its silver salt is very explosive Ag-CΞC-Ag. Even though this isn't purely carbon based, the energy is stored in the tripple bond between the carbon atoms.
There are at least 50 different elements produced in a nuclear explosion, most are fission products in 2 peaks, some are formed by neutron capture and beta decay. The majority of these are radioactive isotopes of the elements.
Einsteinium is a radioactive element and is not inherently explosive. However, it can release energy in the form of radiation as it decays, but it is not known to exhibit explosive properties.
no it is not
Fermium is not inherently explosive. It is a radioactive element that is highly unstable and not found in nature. It is primarily used for research purposes and has not been used in explosive applications.
EXPLOSIVE, RADIOACTIVE potatoes warning do not eat potatoes
Einsteinium is a radioactive element that is not inherently explosive or noxious in its pure form. However, its radioactivity makes it potentially hazardous to health and the environment if not handled properly and with appropriate safety measures.
Nearly 100% of manganese found in nature is 55Mn, which is not radioactive. Trace quantities of 53Mn, which is radioactive, are found in nature, but they are insignificant. Like all elements, synthetic radioactive isotopes of manganese exist.