RIP v2 supports subnets of different sizes. So I guess it would be the router that can, or can not, be configured to summarize routes. (This would not be possible in RIP v1; the size of the subnet is implicit, it is not sent with the routing updates.)
RIP v2 supports subnets of different sizes. So I guess it would be the router that can, or can not, be configured to summarize routes. (This would not be possible in RIP v1; the size of the subnet is implicit, it is not sent with the routing updates.)
RIP v2 supports subnets of different sizes. So I guess it would be the router that can, or can not, be configured to summarize routes. (This would not be possible in RIP v1; the size of the subnet is implicit, it is not sent with the routing updates.)
RIP v2 supports subnets of different sizes. So I guess it would be the router that can, or can not, be configured to summarize routes. (This would not be possible in RIP v1; the size of the subnet is implicit, it is not sent with the routing updates.)
RIP v2 supports subnets of different sizes. So I guess it would be the router that can, or can not, be configured to summarize routes. (This would not be possible in RIP v1; the size of the subnet is implicit, it is not sent with the routing updates.)
Rip V2, EIGRP
Particulars RIP V1 RIP V2 VLSM Support NO Route Propogation Mechanism Broadcast (255.255.255.255 ) Multicast (224.0.0.9) Authentication Mechanism No Yes ( Text & MD5 )----RIP V1-----> Classful routing protocol.RIP V2-----> Classless routing protocol.-----------------------------------------------------RIP V1------> Subnet masks are NOT included in the routing update.RIP V2------> Subnet masks are included in the routing update.-----------------------------------------------------RIP V2 is actually an enhancement of RIP V1's features and extensions raether than an entirely new protocol.
Rip V1 is Classful routing protocol Rip V2 is Classless routing Protocol
OSPFRIP v2EIGRPOSPF, IS-IS and RIP v2 are the open standard IGPs. Also, Cisco's EIGRP.fm
To create route summarization, there are some necessary requirements:Routers need to be running a classless routing protocol, as they carry subnet mask information with them in routing updates. (Examples are RIP v2, OSPF, EIGRP, IS-IS, and BGP.)Addresses need to be assigned in a hierarchical fashion for the summarized address to have the same high-order bits. It does us no good if Winnipeg has network 172.16.64.0 and 172.16.67.0 while 172.16.65.0 resides in Calgary and 172.16.66.0 is assigned in Edmonton. No summarization could take place from the edge routers to Vancouver.Tip:Because most networks use NAT and the 10 network internally, it is important when creating your network design that you assign network subnets in a way that they can be easily summarized. A little more planning now can save you a lot of grief later.
The maximum hop count for Rip version 2 is 15, with 16 being unreachable. This is the same as Rip version 1.
The whole idea of a routing protocol, such as RIP, is that routers learn about other networks (those that are not directly connected) automatically. This reduces the amount of configuration needed, and allows the routers to adapt to changing conditions. For example, if a certain route is not available, an alternate route - should one exist - will be enabled.The whole idea of a routing protocol, such as RIP, is that routers learn about other networks (those that are not directly connected) automatically. This reduces the amount of configuration needed, and allows the routers to adapt to changing conditions. For example, if a certain route is not available, an alternate route - should one exist - will be enabled.The whole idea of a routing protocol, such as RIP, is that routers learn about other networks (those that are not directly connected) automatically. This reduces the amount of configuration needed, and allows the routers to adapt to changing conditions. For example, if a certain route is not available, an alternate route - should one exist - will be enabled.The whole idea of a routing protocol, such as RIP, is that routers learn about other networks (those that are not directly connected) automatically. This reduces the amount of configuration needed, and allows the routers to adapt to changing conditions. For example, if a certain route is not available, an alternate route - should one exist - will be enabled.
HISTORIA AUGUSTA V2. has written: 'HISTORIA AUGUSTA V2'
CLASSFUL ROUTING PROTOCOL. It means it will not carry the routing mask information while routing updates or routing advertisements. it will carry just only the ip-address information's. It will assume just default mask information's. Example : class-A 255.0.0.0 Class-B 255.255.0.0 Class-C 255.255.255.0 So classful routing protocols will not support the VLSM and Supernetting Example of classful routing protocols is 1. RIP V1 2. IGRP CLASSLESS ROUTING PROTOCOL These kind of routing protocols will carry the subnet mask information's while doing the routing updates or routing advertisements. So it will support the VLSM and Supernetting, also support noncontiguous networks Example RIP V2 EIGRP OSPF CLASSFUL ROUTING PROTOCOL. It means it will not carry the routing mask information while routing updates or routing advertisements. it will carry just only the ip-address information's. It will assume just default mask information's. Example : class-A 255.0.0.0 Class-B 255.255.0.0 Class-C 255.255.255.0 So classful routing protocols will not support the VLSM and Supernetting Example of classful routing protocols is 1. RIP V1 2. IGRP CLASSLESS ROUTING PROTOCOL These kind of routing protocols will carry the subnet mask information's while doing the routing updates or routing advertisements. So it will support the VLSM and Supernetting, also support noncontiguous networks Example RIP V2 EIGRP OSPF
v4 - 9v2
You could buy a Robosapien v2 in ebay
Wernher Van Braun invted the v2