Want this question answered?
There is plenty of fossil records and observable speciation to provide evidence for Evolution. Within the scientific community there is little to no debate on whether evolution is wrong. No concrete evidence has been provided by anyone to dispute the claims of evolution since its formulation by Darwin, otherwise it would have been discarded through the scientific method.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------While the above is right, observation and scientific studies provide evidence and arguments to the theory.
Evolutionists say that the purpose of life is to simply reproduce and reproduce. The theory tells us that we originated from a single bacteria to what we today know as homo sapiens. Yet bacteria are the BEST reproducing organisms in earth - it can reproduce MILLIONS in so little time. We humans reproduce after 9 months. In that way, evolution makes no sense. We should've remained as bacteria then, if reproduction really was the purpose. The above answer is full of non sequiturs and illogical arguments. Example: The piece about reproduction is terrible confused. The coin evolution pays in is REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS, not just a greater mass of reproduction. Both bacteria and humans are reproductively successful, which shows that there are many strategies practiced by various organisms that lead to individual reproductive success.
In chemistry, buffers are frequently used to neutralize acidic solutions.
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
Most of the impetus for developing general relativity came entirely out of Einstein's thoughts. Einstein needed some time to choose the mathematics necessary to fully develop the theory, and Tulio Levi-Civita assisted him in finding tensor algebra as the best approach. In a sense, David Hilbert assisted Einstein in that both were working, independently of each other, on finding the equations. This "race," not uncommon in science, inspires both people to do their best work. There is some dispute on who reached the answer first, but Hilbert always stated that Einstein deserved full credit for starting the investigation.
It means that there is enough evidence to lead a "reasonable person" to believe that there is sufficient evidence to supports the facts that are in in dispute.
he beliefs history is the memory of the peole
That is a matter of dispute. There is no concrete evidence that it has ever been truly found.
Yes few survivers dispute it and evidence of it splitting was found when the wreck was discovered.
If the lien appears on your credit report, you dispute it with the credit bureau. You can do this by ordering your credit report on line and issuing a dispute through their investigation department, of course, you will have to provide evidence for your claim.
Appellate Justices look at the issue that is up on appeal. For example, if some evidence was admitted at trial, and there is dispute over whether it is legally admissible, they look at the type
He himself is of Irish stock. Why would he advocate eating his own people
Yes , as long as the information is recorded and they are in custody of it, can serve as a veritable material to dispute your claim.
You need to hire an attorney who can review the title to the property, the reason for the lawsuit and provide evidence to defend your position.
minitrial
Go to court and testify with proof, witnesses, or evidence, that you WEREN'T driving on the wrong side of the road.
Kevin Sullivan was a wrestler who is believed to have killed Benoit and his family over a dispute regarding Sullivan's wife. There is not solid evidence.