Want this question answered?
Locke believed that political society was created to protect individual rights
Is the obligation of management to protect and improve the welfare of society alongside the interest of the business enteprise
Locke believed that political society was created to protect individual rights.
To protect is to prevent. Prevention is better than cure. It reduces greatly cost and suffering incurred due to illhealth to individual and society.
Voting/civic involvement
institution
Society for Individual Freedom was created in 1942.
As a communist society the individual is secondary to the state or communal group. As a simplistic answer to your question individuals are not as valued as the state so what Americans may consider as "individual rights" are not looked on favorably in a communist society. Almost any individual right that Americans cherish and sometimes take for granted are frowned upon in China. An example of this is an individuals right to freedom of speech. Certain things said in China such as speaking against the state will actually be answered by an unwelcome invitation to spend time in one of China's penal facilities. Privacy is also another issue...there is no reasonable consideration of privacy in China. As a part of the group rather than as an individual one is considered property of the state therefore no reason for privacy exists in the communist government of China. Hope this helps.
Both! Justice should be given to every individual BUT...if that individual is a danger to society,society needs justice as well. Good question and just shows how contradicting a simple law can be.Another View: With as much due respect to the rights of individuals as possible, the answer is, whichever provides the greatest good for the greatest number.'Life' is not fair, and does not guarantee equal outcome for everyone.
Laws set guidelines and limit areas of uncertainty.
social obligation is feeling morally or legally bound/ indebted to society. it is a moral responsibility to do something generally acceptable by society. For example, parents have a social obligation to teach children good manners.
Our society resembles "1984" in terms of pervasive surveillance, control by powerful authorities, and manipulation of information. There are parallels in terms of erosion of privacy and individual freedoms, as well as the potential for authoritarian rule to suppress dissent and control the population.