No, the system doesn't work like that.
The Supreme Court is not a trier of fact: they don't determine a defendant's guilt or innocence. When the Court agrees to review a case, it analyzes whether the legal procedures in a case were conducted in accordance with constitutional protections, and whether laws applied to a case were constitutional, but don't review material evidence or errors.
If the Court determines the appellant's constitutional rights have been violated and the case needs further attention, or the appellant deserves a new trial, they remand (send the case back) to the lower courts for disposition.
The Constitution does not give the Supreme Court the authority to issue pardons. Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution confers this power on the President: "The President ... shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment."
This authority does not extend to people convicted under State laws, who would need to petition the Governor of that State for clemency.
No, the president does not need approval. Look at the constitution article 2, section 2Clause 2.He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The president is in complete control, he doesn't need approval
The pardon granted to Nixon by Ford probably cost him the election.
Ford's pardon.
The president has granted the criminal a reprieve.
No, it is a power granted to the President. Generally the do so at the end of their term
No. President Ford pardoned former President Nixon for any past crimes committed against the United States. No pardon can apply to crimes committed in the future of when the pardon is granted.
The president of the United States is not allowed to grant pardons in cases of impeachment. The president can grant pardons in other cases though.
Richard Nixon resigned the presidency on August 9th, 1974. He was succeeded by his appointed Vice President, Gerald Ford. On September 8th, 1974 Ford granted Nixon a "free and full" pardon.
Huh? Once the pardon is granted (IF it is granted) nothing else needs be done to make it 'effective.' First and foremost you have to GET the pardon from the Governor's Office.
No. The president or a governor (depending on whether it is a federal or state conviction) can pardon someone. Courts can reverse a person's conviction, which would have a similar effect, but they are different processes.Added: The Judicial Branch is legally incapable of issuing a "pardon' to anyone. Only the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch (Governor or President) can issue a pardon.
The president's power to release a person from the punishment or legal consequences of a crime is through the use of a pardon. A presidential pardon is a legal forgiveness of a crime and can be granted to individuals who have been convicted of federal offenses.
Many rights specifically granted to one branch of the US Government in the Constitution are thus prohibited to the other two. So any power specifically granted to the President or the Supreme Court (the Executive Veto for the first and the ability to find laws unconstitutional for the latter) are technically off-limits to the Congress. The Congress may also not pardon prisoners, as that is a right given to the President.