yes it does. the theory of plate tectonics states that at one time all plates and land masses accordingly were one land mass (Pangaea i believe. Over millions of years these plates shifted, moved, and some broke away from the mass Pangaea. This is supported by the Coastlines because if you notice many of the coast lines of neighboring contents seem to be able to fit perfectly with one another like a puzzle thus supporting the theory that all plates were once in the same place and Begin to shift and move around the planet.
I've examined plate charts and yes in some places, like along North America's Pacific Coast, the coastlines and plates sometimes, but not always, align.
Continents fit together like Africa and South America. Pangea is how the Earth's continents used to be before continental drift.
Observations of a map of the continents hinted that the continents once fitted together. Later, he would discover fossil evidence to support his theory. But alas, he was unable to explain the mechanism by which the continents could move, and was soundly thrashed by geologists of his time. The discoveries leading to the science of plate tectonics were not made until the mid twentieth century.
shapes of the continents fit together. fossils of same dinosaur are found in different continents. same plant fossils in different continents.
No it does not, the molten core inside the Earth is what drives plate tectonics. The Sun has nothing to do with the process.
fossils of once living things provide clues that support contenental drift
Earthquakes, volcanoes, canyons, mid-ocean ridges, mountain ranges and so on and the results of plate tectonics.
the modern theory is that all the continents used to be connected (Pangaea). The evidence is that the coastal boundaries fit together like a puzzle piece. another example is that the same species of animals are found on the coasts of the continents that once were touching
continental drift and plate tectonics are two side of a coin. As the continents are interlinked with the plates; so as the plate moved due to conviction current the continents also tends to move causing continental drift. Moment of plates due to conviction current or due to the adjacent plate is called plate tectonics.
There are two basic evidences to support this theory: 1. Animals or plants of the same species can be found on separated continents (for example, Africa and Australia or North America and Europe) naturally, and have not been placed by man. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, allowing the animals and plants to disperse. 2. The continents all seem to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, but have since broken off and their Coastlines have eroded since then, which explains why they do not perfectly fit together.
There are two basic evidences to support this theory: 1. Animals or plants of the same species can be found on separated continents (for example, Africa and Australia or North America and Europe) naturally, and have not been placed by man. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, allowing the animals and plants to disperse. 2. The continents all seem to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This must mean all the continents were previously connected, but have since broken off and their coastlines have eroded since then, which explains why they do not perfectly fit together.
The theory of plate tectonics has succumbed to the newer theory of continental drift. Scientists believe this theory today due to three main factors. First, the continents appear to fit together. When the continental shelves, as opposed to just the continents, are placed together, the fit appears uncanny. Second, the distribution of fossils is consistent with continental drift. Lastly, glacial deposits once covered parts of the earth that are currently tropical.ANSWER: The plate tectonics theory is relatively new and formulated only in the 1960s. The evidence listed above in the first answer can only support the continental drift theory which was developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Evidence that can support the plate tectonics theory are the age, depth of oceanic sediments, volcanic activity, geothermal gradient, gravity anomalies, paleomagnetism and seismologic evidence. If you are answering an exam question on evidence supporting plate tectonics, evidence supporting continental drift theory should only come later in your answer and should not be given too much emphasis, for the plate tectonics theory involves more than just the continental crust drifting around and cannot support the main hypotheses of the plate tectonics theory.
Observations of a map of the continents hinted that the continents once fitted together. Later, he would discover fossil evidence to support his theory. But alas, he was unable to explain the mechanism by which the continents could move, and was soundly thrashed by geologists of his time. The discoveries leading to the science of plate tectonics were not made until the mid twentieth century.
yes it represets plate tectonics
the continents fit together like a puzzle
The shapes of continents appearing on the map clearly show similar shapes and how the continents might fit together.
shapes of the continents fit together. fossils of same dinosaur are found in different continents. same plant fossils in different continents.
* Identical fossils of a small reptile have been found in Africa and Soth America * Mountains in Europe and the USA were once part of a large mountain chain * Rocks found in Britain were formaed in desert conditions
Pangaea , all the continents are thought to have fit together millions of years ago.