It might, if the light bulb is giving off heat such that the place the ice-cube is in is warmer than the temperature of the surrounding area.
Otherwise, no.
No. A light year is a measure of distance, not time; it is the distance that light travels in a year. So a cubic light year is a measure of volume, rather like a cubic foot or cubic meeter only much larger.
I think these are the factors: - temperature - sun ray - the surface which the ice cube is placed on and maybe - the size of the ice cube
Mass holds temperature--the more mass, the better it holds temperature...but, conversely, the longer it takes to get it to temperature all the way through.
A salt cube
Im not sure about time, but add salt or any impurity to a solution will lower its freezing point.
The tidal effect of a body increases as a cube of the distance.
No. A light year is a measure of distance, not time; it is the distance that light travels in a year. So a cubic light year is a measure of volume, rather like a cubic foot or cubic meeter only much larger.
Yes. If ou have a 60 watt bulb over an ice cube, it would melt quicker than a 40, 30, or 20 watt. If you place the bulb close or farther away, that can also affect how fast the ice cube is melted. This would be a good science expirement to study, in my opinion. Also, the color of the glass around the bulb affects it, but that is another subject.
1.
The square of the orbital period of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit.
I think these are the factors: - temperature - sun ray - the surface which the ice cube is placed on and maybe - the size of the ice cube
Mass holds temperature--the more mass, the better it holds temperature...but, conversely, the longer it takes to get it to temperature all the way through.
ice cube
no
Depending on the difference and the temperature and circumference
The shortest distance, through the body of the cube, is sqrt(22 + 22 + 22) = sqrt(12) = 3.46 inches.
A salt cube