A theocracy is not a democracy; being ruled by God (or by His representative) is not the same as being ruled by the majority of voters. However, it is possible to combine democracy and theocracy. In Iran, for example, there is a Supreme Council of Ayatollahs which is the ultimate authority, and can overrule any decision of the Iranian government, however, there is also an elected Iranian government. So Iran does have elections, but the elections do not really matter since the real power in the country is an unelected body of clerics.
In some cases, theocracies may hold elections, but the extent to which these elections are free and fair can vary. In some theocratic countries, elections may be limited to specific candidates or groups that align with the religious authority. There may also be restrictions on political parties or dissenting views. Overall, theocracy tends to prioritize religious authority over democratic principles, so the level of freedom in elections can be limited.
Free elections
Yes, Ireland does have free elections. It is a democratic country.
no
A note on elections
Yes.
Nope.
Iran is a direct theocracy and Saudi Arabia is an indirect theocracy.Direct Theocracy: Iran is a direct theocracy because the Ayatollahs are all clergy of the Twelver Shiite Islam religion. Although Iran has an elected parliament, who can run in the elections (and often the results) are controlled by the non-elected Supreme Council of Ayatollahs. Indirect Theocracy: Saudi Arabia is considered an indirect theocracy, because it is actually absolute monarchy where the Saudi King does not have religious authority, but the Wahhabi Councils, which do have religious authority, have strong influence with the Saudi King and in public policy.
A dielectric, insulator or insulation Is a substance that inhibits or stops the flow of free elections
Stalin promised free elections in Poland, notwithstanding the recently installed Communist puppet government. However, it soon became apparent that Stalin had no intentions of holding true to his promise of free elections. In fact, it was fifty years after the Yalta Conference that the Poles first had the opportunity to hold free elections.
In a Democratic country, open, free and fair elections ARE necessary, indeed VITAL.
promote competition from opposition parties.
YES