no it does not, it might have an interferance fit engine though. some do and some dont. what this actually means is that if the timing belt breaks, or is not installed correctly, when the pistons are coming up, and the valves are down they are going to interfere with each other, causing major eng damage. if it is a non-interferance eng, then the pistons will not interfere with valve travel.
Yes.
no after 1998 they are but the 1993-1997 Chrysler 3.5l engines are not
NO. Gates belts has a list. This engine is not interference.
Yes
YES - according to Gates ( they manufacture timing belts etc. ) the 2.3 L four cylinder engine used in the 1997 Ford Ranger IS A NON INTERFERANCE ENGINE
On a 1995 Mercury Tracer : According to the Gates website ( they make timing belts etcetera ) ( both the 1.8 and 1.9 liter four cylinder engines are NON INTERFERENCE )
Yes , the 2.2 L - 4 cylinder engine in a 1991 Honda Accord is an interferance engine ( according to www . gates . com - no spaces - they manufacture timing belts etc. )
Yes , it is an interference engine according to Gates ( they manufacture timing belts etc. )
Yes , Gates ( they make timing belts etc. ) shows it as an interference engine
No , it IS NOT an interference engine (according to the Gates website , they make timing belts etc.)
No , it IS NOT an interference engine ( according to the Gates website - they make timing belts etc. )
There are four seat belts in a Chrysler Sebring Convertible. The car seats 4 passengers, and seats must have seat belts installed as a safety precaution.