It is correct. The basic sentence is, "Worker is lazy." The subject is "worker". The connecting verb is "is", and the predicate adjective is, "lazy". "The" modifies "factory's", and "The factory's" modifies "resident". "The factory's resident" and "blithe" modify worker and "not" modifies "lazy". Of course the use of "not" to modify "lazy" changes the entire meaning of the sentence.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
Hi!
You need to learn the rules of English grammar to be able to correct sentences.
"Go!" is the shortest complete sentence, since an imperative (an order, such as "Go!" ) can stand alone in English without a subject. In this kind of sentence, the pronoun "you" is the implied subject.
Yes. There is no word that cannot begin an English sentence. But that does not mean that it is always a good way to begin one.
You have spelled the words correctly in English. Grammatically, you could leave out 'that' in your sentence.
The sentence is grammatically too poor to make a full translationIch lieb' = I love
Yes, "she treated us to a great dinner" is grammatically correct English.
Both of these sentences are grammatically correct. I am studying is the present continuous tense. I study is the simple present tense.
I do not think that the sentence is grammatically correct. The sentence seems ambiguous to me. Is the statement suggesting that "she has good command" of a group of people or animals? Or, is the statement suppose to imply that "she has command" of the English language?
If you are speaking of "Marion, you are great," yes, that is correct. In English the construction is called "direct address."
Not in English grammatically.