Want this question answered?
A clear sign for voters to end slavery permanently by amending the Constitution was a realization that it was morally wrong. Many political leaders helped to make this a reality but it still took nearly a century before it would begin to result in equality among races.
It was greatly helped when SHerman captured Atlanta.
To change the bill in some way. Usually this means specifying something or making something more clear.
can u make the question clear
James Madison, known as the father of the Constitution of the United States, is chiefly responsible for the clear legalistic prose of the Constitution. He was a firm believer in a weak and limited Federal government.
Speaking in a grammatical sense, one sets a precedent, not a precedence. Precedent in law refers to a legal decision that serves as a rule or pattern in future cases. Example: There is a clear precedent to support the argument of the plaintiff. Precedence refers to the act of coming before in time or being more important than something else. Example: Although the bride's father wanted to walk her down the aisle, the bride's mother was given precedence since she had raised her daughter alone for her first 21 years.
Answer: No. Cheating is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. Answer: It isn't clear what constitution you are talking about (basically, most, or all, countries have a constitution). But I don't think ANY constitution specifically mentions a "right to cheat".
He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.
It is not clear what constitution you are talking about, but many constitutions mention things like equality of all citizens, human rights, etc.
Yes I would...if you understand the reason Alexander Hamilton, wanted to put into effect the Bill of Rights. He felt that human rights were "not specifically defined." Although there were arguments from James Madison, that the Constitution was clear on these rights, and did not need amended. However, Hamilton insisted, that it needed to be clearly stated. Madison was afraid that by "Amending" the Constitution, it would lead to further amendments, that would "change" the initial meaning of the Constitution.
The US Constitution is written in English. Some of the usage may seem antiquated, but it is clear English nonetheless.
yes