answersLogoWhite

0

Establishing a clear precedent for amending the constitution?

Updated: 9/17/2019
User Avatar

AngelikGonzlezLantig...

Lvl 1
8y ago

Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Establishing a clear precedent for amending the constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a clear sign from the voters to end slavery permanently by amending the Constitution?

A clear sign for voters to end slavery permanently by amending the Constitution was a realization that it was morally wrong. Many political leaders helped to make this a reality but it still took nearly a century before it would begin to result in equality among races.


What is true about Lincoln's reelection in 1864?

It was greatly helped when SHerman captured Atlanta.


Purpose of amending a bill?

To change the bill in some way. Usually this means specifying something or making something more clear.


Which OSI layer is responsible for establishing and managing these different?

can u make the question clear


Which delegate was chiefly responsible for the clear legalistic prose of the constitution?

James Madison, known as the father of the Constitution of the United States, is chiefly responsible for the clear legalistic prose of the Constitution. He was a firm believer in a weak and limited Federal government.


Do you set a precedent or set a precedence?

Speaking in a grammatical sense, one sets a precedent, not a precedence. Precedent in law refers to a legal decision that serves as a rule or pattern in future cases. Example: There is a clear precedent to support the argument of the plaintiff. Precedence refers to the act of coming before in time or being more important than something else. Example: Although the bride's father wanted to walk her down the aisle, the bride's mother was given precedence since she had raised her daughter alone for her first 21 years.


Is it in the constitution that you have the right to cheat?

Answer: No. Cheating is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. Answer: It isn't clear what constitution you are talking about (basically, most, or all, countries have a constitution). But I don't think ANY constitution specifically mentions a "right to cheat".


How can a man proceed in a relationship when the woman continues to change the rules every other day?

He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.He should insist on establishing clear rules. And, the rules should not be dictated by the woman alone. The relationship should not be dominated by one of the partners - that won't work in the long run.


What are the morals of the constitution?

It is not clear what constitution you are talking about, but many constitutions mention things like equality of all citizens, human rights, etc.


Would the Constitution have passed without the Bill of Rights?

Yes I would...if you understand the reason Alexander Hamilton, wanted to put into effect the Bill of Rights. He felt that human rights were "not specifically defined." Although there were arguments from James Madison, that the Constitution was clear on these rights, and did not need amended. However, Hamilton insisted, that it needed to be clearly stated. Madison was afraid that by "Amending" the Constitution, it would lead to further amendments, that would "change" the initial meaning of the Constitution.


What languages were used in the US Constitution?

The US Constitution is written in English. Some of the usage may seem antiquated, but it is clear English nonetheless.


Did the US Constitution of 1787 provided a clear definition of US citizenship that excluded blacks?

yes