Want this question answered?
Along with Robert Hooke he showed that that sound does not travel through a vacuum. OR Boyle demonstrated that the sound of a bell in the receiver faded as the air was removed, proving that air was necessary for the transmission of sound idk which but i hopes this works! :D
what are the 2 important charactristics of sound? what are the 2 important charactristics of sound?
-- The answer regarding air is "Yes". This is a large part of the reason thatyou're able to hear someone talking who is sitting or standing next to you.-- The answer regarding water is "Yes". That's a large part of the reason thatwhales and dolphins are able to communicate with each other.
The word loudness belongs to psycho acoustics and tells how we feel this sound, that is not measuring the sound like we do with a sound pressure meter. Listening to music means motion to the ear drums. Only sound pressure moves the ear drums. The energy or the sound intensity is much less important here. Sound intensity belongs more to the noise fighters.
Sensory evidence of chemical reactions may be: - Change of color - Change of odor - Change of aspect - Change of the temperature - A violent reaction with explosion or fire - Bubbling - Emitting a sound - Emitting a light
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Evidence to support the argument.
evidence to support the argument
No, there is no logical argument that is more supported or logically sound than an atheist's. If there was, it likely would be well known.
Infowars Nightly News with Alex Jones - 2011 Does Berating People with No Evidence Make a Sound Argument was released on: USA: 30 April 2013
For your argument to be valid and thus persuasive, your points must be sound. Otherwise, a thinking person will ignore your conclusion and dismiss your argument.
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
It describes two kinds of argument in logic. A sound argument is valid (logically coherent) and its premises are true. And unsound argument is not sound.
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
Sound.
sound premises + strong facts + strong conclusion = effective solid argument
No, but all sound arguments are valid arguments. A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument where the premises are accepted as true.