0
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is sound and unsound?
It describes two kinds of argument in logic. A sound argument is valid (logically coherent) and its premises are true. And unsound argument is not sound.
When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you do you think it is more important to be valid or sound?
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
Can an argument be invalid and sound?
No, but it can be unsound and valid.
What does sound and unsound mean for an argument?
A sound argument is one that is backed up by personal observation or experience, or more appropriately, logic and reason. An unsound argument is one that can be easily disproved, or is based only on emotion or feelings, or other non-objective means and methods.
What is the definition of cogent?
An argument that is strong, sound, and valid is a cogent one.
What is sound and unsound?
It describes two kinds of argument in logic. A sound argument is valid (logically coherent) and its premises are true. And unsound argument is not sound.
How can you tell if you are dealing with a sound argument?
A sound argument is one that is logically valid and has true premises. To determine if you are dealing with a sound argument, you need to check if the premises are true and if the reasoning is valid. If both conditions are met, then the argument is sound.
Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?
An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
What word is used to classify an argument if it is valid and all of its premises are true?
The word used to classify an argument if it is valid and all of its premises are true is "sound." A sound argument is when the logical structure of the argument is valid and all the premises are true, leading to a logically sound conclusion.
All valid arguments are sound arguments?
This statement is not correct. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. A sound argument, on the other hand, is a valid argument with true premises. So, while all sound arguments are valid, not all valid arguments are sound.
Which does a speaker use to make a sound argument?
Evidence to support the argument.
Which does a speaker use to create a sound argument?
evidence to support the argument
Can An argument can have suppressed or missing premises?
Yes, an argument can have suppressed or missing premises. An argument with suppressed premises does not explicitly state all the premises needed for the conclusion to logically follow, while an argument with missing premises does not include all the premises required for a valid argument. This can result in potential gaps or weaknesses in the reasoning presented.
How can you tell if an argument is sound?
An argument is sound if it is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and all the premises are true. To determine if an argument is sound, you need to assess both its logical structure (validity) and the truth of its premises.
Is it possible to have a sound valid inductive argument?
Yes, it is possible to have a sound valid inductive argument. For an inductive argument to be sound, it must have a valid form (the conclusion must logically follow from the premises) and have true premises. This combination of validity and truth makes the argument sound.
When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you do you think it is more important to be valid or sound?
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
