0
The Apollo programs were For Real. The only thing that does require explanation is certain aspects of the missions ( such as stage separation and re-entry) simply could not be photographed even with telephoto lenses and therefore , in certain situations, technical animation was shown on the Tv screens, nearly always overprinted ( Animation) or ( Simulation) the simulation was high-caliber and similar to that used on the Science Propagation ( I wouldn"t call it Propaganda as the science part was accurate- show called The Big World of Little Atom. (maybe Adam but I always thought it was the atom symbol). There were certain lapses that required delayed radio responses ( a special tone was used) and as mentioned some things simply do not photograph, and therefore trick animation, but crafty, was used. case closed.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is the 1967 moon landing a hoax?
The first manned moon landing occured in 1969, not 1967. That being said, the 1969 landing was not a hoax.
Is it true that the moon landing was a hoax?
It was not a hoax, it was real.
Was landing on the moon a hoax?
No, the moon landings were real. Another answer: Although many people do believe this, and some claim that they have evidence, I don't think that it is a hoax. Believe what you want, but it isn't.
What Is The Lunar Landing Hoax?
The Apollo moon hoax is a claim by misguided (or deliberately lying) individuals who claim to have evidence that NASA faked the 6 manned moon landing missions.The theory was first written about in 1974 by Bill Kaysing in his book We Never Went to the Moon: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Swindle jumped in the fray from there.The facts, however, show that the moon landings were real. The evidence supporting the truth of the landings is voluminous. Anybody claiming the moon landings are fake have either been misled or are deliberately lying.
What did some people believe about the 1969 moon landing?
That it was just a hoax.
Is the 1967 moon landing a hoax?
The first manned moon landing occured in 1969, not 1967. That being said, the 1969 landing was not a hoax.
Is it true that the moon landing was a hoax?
It was not a hoax, it was real.
Was landing on the moon a hoax?
No, the moon landings were real. Another answer: Although many people do believe this, and some claim that they have evidence, I don't think that it is a hoax. Believe what you want, but it isn't.
Why some people believe that the moon landing was a hoax?
Because they choose to deny the overwhelming evidence that proves that 12 men really did fly to the moon and land on its surface and walk on it. There is no concrete evidence to support any hoax hypothesis.
Why was it a hoax moon landing?
It wasn't, the moon landings were real.
What Is The Lunar Landing Hoax?
The Apollo moon hoax is a claim by misguided (or deliberately lying) individuals who claim to have evidence that NASA faked the 6 manned moon landing missions.The theory was first written about in 1974 by Bill Kaysing in his book We Never Went to the Moon: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Swindle jumped in the fray from there.The facts, however, show that the moon landings were real. The evidence supporting the truth of the landings is voluminous. Anybody claiming the moon landings are fake have either been misled or are deliberately lying.
What did some people believe about the 1969 moon landing?
That it was just a hoax.
Who started the moon landing is a hoax theorie?
The first book claiming the Apollo Missions were a hoax was written by Bill Kaysing in 1974 called We Didn't Go to the Moon: NASA's 30 Billion Dollar Swindle.
How many people believe that moon landing mission is a hoax?
Around 6%
How much of Britain say the moon landing was a hoax?
Only cranks and conspiracy theorists.
What are the release dates for MythBusters - 2003 NASA Moon Landing Hoax 6-11?
MythBusters - 2003 NASA Moon Landing Hoax 6-11 was released on: USA: 27 August 2008 Australia: 25 July 2009
Is the moon landing hoax?
No, but there have been various conspiracy theorists trying to claim it was a hoax for whatever unstated reasons of their own. Egos, probably.
