0
Explain why natural explanations of the world may lead people to become atheists or agnostics?
Science can explain where the world came from and where humans came from without any reference to God. This may lead some people to be agnostic, that is, they are unsure whether or not there is a God. For them, the argument that you need God to explain why we are here is no longer valid.
Other people may be led to become atheists, that is, they are sure there is no God. They believe that, if God exists, he must have made the world and he must be the only explanation of the world. The scientific explanation of the world and humans without any reference to God is proof to such people that God does not exist.
What else can I help you with?
Three goals of science?
1. Investigate and understand the natural world. 2. Explain events in the natural world. 3. Use those explanations to make predictions.
What is the basic sciences goal?
The goal of science is to investigate and understand the natural world, to explain events in the natural world, and to use those explanations to make useful predictions
What are the most compelling atheist proofs against the existence of a higher power?
Atheists often argue against the existence of a higher power by pointing to the lack of empirical evidence, the presence of suffering and evil in the world, and the inconsistencies in religious texts. They also question the need for a higher power to explain the universe, as science can provide natural explanations for many phenomena.
What do natural philosophers do?
Natural philosophers study the natural world through observation and sometimes experimentation to understand its underlying principles and phenomena. They aim to explain natural phenomena using reason and logic rather than religious or supernatural explanations.
How is mythology related to Greek religan?
As they lacked our scientific knowledge to explain natural events, they invented myths to explain them. The myths were religious in focus. Even today, with clear scientific knowledge and explanations, many people still accept a religious basis for natural happenings.
How do atheists believe the world was made?
There is no set atheist belief for how the world was created. Atheism is just a lack of belief in any deity. Thus an atheist will not believe that a deity was involved in the formation of the earth. Atheists would in all likelihood all subscribe to one of the many scientific theories about the origins of the universe and the resulting origin of the earth. That means, they (we) would take a naturalistic view on its origins: The Big Bang Theory, "M" Theory, and so forth. Atheism is not a religion.There is no unifying belief, only a unifying lack of belief. So atheists do not all actually 'believe in' anything. Atheists do not share beliefs or morals nor is there a code of belief for atheism. Therefore, while some atheists may believe Earth was formed from the sun as science dictates, and some can believe aliens made Earth, 'atheists' in general have no general "beliefs'. Atheists generally rely on science to explain the natural world. They do not create myths to explain things that cannot be explained yet.
Why are the explanations provided in Greek myths of nature's mysteries no longer believable?
They are no longer believable because we now have science to prove natural phenomenon that were impossible to explain before.
Why are theories considered to be the truth?
Theories are not considered the absolute truth, but rather plausible explanations based on evidence and observations. They are subject to revision or rejection with new evidence or better explanations. The strength of a theory lies in its ability to predict and explain natural phenomena consistently.
What most likely represents how Greeks viewed their myths?
In the absence of the scientific explanations of natural events available to us today, the myths were invented to explain them. They had nowhere else to go.
What is the difference between evolution and theories of evolution?
Evolution is the process by which species change over time through natural selection. Theories of evolution, such as Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, are explanations for how evolution occurs and the mechanisms driving it. In essence, evolution is the phenomenon, while theories of evolution are the explanations for how it happens.
How are a scientific law and a theory similar?
Both scientific laws and theories are explanations of natural phenomena based on empirical evidence. They both strive to describe, predict, and explain specific aspects of the natural world. However, laws are typically concise statements that describe a relationship or pattern, while theories are more comprehensive explanations that incorporate multiple laws and hypotheses.
How did people explain natural events before the enlightenment and scientific revolution?
Before the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution, people commonly explained natural events through myth, religion, and superstition. These explanations often involved attributing natural events to the will of gods, spirits, or supernatural forces. Observations and explanations were frequently based on beliefs passed down through cultural traditions rather than empirical evidence or scientific inquiry.
