There is insufficient information to answer the question.
To find the wavelength, you can use the formula: wavelength = speed of wave / frequency. Given that the wave is traveling at 56 m/s and has a frequency of 48 Hz, you can calculate the wavelength by dividing the speed (56 m/s) by the frequency (48 Hz), which gives you a wavelength of approximately 1.17 meters.
You probably meant to say 56 meters per second, so I will answer it that way. 56 meters/sec /06 1/sec = 9.3 meters
56 Hz.
The waves with a 2MHz frequency would have a longer wavelength compared to those with a 56 Hz frequency. Wavelength and frequency are inversely related according to the equation: wavelength = speed of light / frequency. Since the speed of light is constant, higher frequency waves have shorter wavelengths.
First of all I just want to tell that if we have to compare two things then we should always find a relationship between each other, its not always like a formula. it can be anything. Well the relationship between frequency and wavelength is given by Wavelength = Speed of light (299792458m/s) / frequency (/s) putting the values we get the wavelength of 56 Hz or 56 (per second) to be- 5353436.75m and of 2 Mhz to be 149.8m i think you could have just said 56 Hz has a bigger wavelength.
Wavelength at 2 MHz = 149.896 meters Wavelength at 56 Hz = 5,353.437 meters Lower frequency --> longer wavelength. Higher frequency --> shorter wavelength When you multiply (frequency) times (wavelength), the result is always the same number.
The waves with a 2 MHz frequency would have a longer wavelength compared to waves with a 56 Hz frequency. Wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, so as frequency increases, the wavelength decreases.
C=λv 340 m/s= 20 1/sec (λ) v= 17 m= ~56 ft
You need to have a good understanding that if the signal is wiggling slower,then it can travel farther during each wiggle.Now we can proceed to calculate the wavelengths. If the answer is truly unknownto you, then we won't even bother trying to drag you through the proportions.We'll just calculate each wavelength, and then compare them:Wavelength = (speed of light) divided by (frequency.We'll assume that we're talking about radio waves, just so we have a speedto work with. The result will be similar for any kind of wave.At 56 Hz, wavelength = (3 x 108) / (56) = 5,357,000 meters (about 3,329 miles)(rounded)At 2 MHz, wavelength = (3 x 108) / (2 x 106) = 150 metersYes, the wavelength at 56 Hz is longer than the wavelength at 2 MHz.
The size of a sound wave is typically measured in terms of its wavelength, which is the distance between two consecutive peaks or troughs of the wave. The wavelength of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its frequency, meaning that higher frequency sounds have shorter wavelengths and lower frequency sounds have longer wavelengths. Sound waves can vary in size depending on factors such as the frequency and amplitude of the sound.
No it is not. 0 is less than 56.
i kinda depends on the speed limit. But around where i live it is 56 miles per 56 mins.