0
Following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
Why are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Which best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
How do historians use primary and secondary sources?
A primary source is like a diary of somebody that has experienced something or the person them self (autobiography) A secondary source is when somebody has heard the story and retells it or writes about it. (biography) A primary source is the most reliable because information can be lost or changed by a secondary source so historians favor primary sources.
What problems do gaps in evidence cause historians?
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
What is a secondary siurce for hiatorian?
Frequently, they also take advantage of the work of other historians by using other secondary sources.
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
What tools do historians?
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
What tools do historians use?
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
What describes and advantages for secondary sources have over primary sources historians?
They can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. (APEX)
Which of the following historians has organized her study of the pass based on the category period?
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source is conclusion is valid?
Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?
secondary
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources?
(Apex) They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
What terms describes?
secondary xylem
Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and the secondary sources they used to answer their questions?
to be happy
Are secondary sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
