Yes.
Shorter bond lengths. N2 is very strong with its triple bond.
Energy with shorter weve lengths, such as ultra violet, has higher energy levels than those with longer wave lengths, such as infrareds. So, I assume the portions of the visible spectrum with shorter wave lengths benefit photosynthesis the most.
I believe there is no chemical equation for this. this is because though the wick burning has a chemical reaction, the wax melting, making the candle shorter, is not undergoing a chemical reaction. simply a short change of state. If you were referring to the wick brurning though, this would be a combustion reaction. hope that helps.
It is physical
Millimetres are shorter than an inch, yes. There are 25.4 millimetres in an inch. Therefore a millimetre is 25.4 times shorter than an inch.
Shorter bond lengths. N2 is very strong with its triple bond.
Sigma bonds are generally formed before the shorter ans stronger pi bonds.
The 7mm Mauser is generally considered short action. 7x57 is shorter than 30-06. OTHER 7mms are different lengths.
I assume by light rays, you mean visible light rays. In this case, gamma rays have shorter wave lengths.
The issue is not frequency and wavelength, a relationship is the problem AM Wave length is longer, than FM Wave length. Shorter wave lengths have a tendency to be shorter in the pm. AM Wave lengths were used before FM wave lengths.
Chords come in various lengths, which may be longer, shorter, or the same length as the radius.
Energy with shorter weve lengths, such as ultra violet, has higher energy levels than those with longer wave lengths, such as infrareds. So, I assume the portions of the visible spectrum with shorter wave lengths benefit photosynthesis the most.
Ultraviolet.
Everything else being equal, a shorter bridge is stronger: it will weigh less, and therefore will not have to support so much of its own weight.
They are straight lines. The sum of the squares of the lengths of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the length of the longest side. But subject to that constraint, the sides can have any lengths.They are straight lines. The sum of the squares of the lengths of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the length of the longest side. But subject to that constraint, the sides can have any lengths.They are straight lines. The sum of the squares of the lengths of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the length of the longest side. But subject to that constraint, the sides can have any lengths.They are straight lines. The sum of the squares of the lengths of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the length of the longest side. But subject to that constraint, the sides can have any lengths.
X-rays are shorter waves than ultraviolet ones.
lengths are also dilated, or shorter. If a frame of reference is moving past us the time elapsed relative tot he witness is shorter and its length shorter.