The Gospel of John is more mystical than any of the Synoptic Gospels. It emphasizes that Jesus Christ is the One who meditates between God and because he is humanity, true God and true man, in the unity of his divine person.
We write in a different style today. We are taught to state our purpose at the beginning of our writtings so the reader will know what they are going to be reading. It was common in biblical times to write this purpose at the end. This is what John did. In the following verse he states his purpose for writing the Gospel of John. People may not agree with it but we cannot change the original purpose of the author. This would not be honest scholarship.
JOH 20:31 but these have been written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.
If you now read the book of John you can see how this theme is throughout the whole book.
Each gospel was written at a different time for a different readership and for a different purpose
The Gospel of Matthew was written to the Jews and shows that Christ is the rightful heir of the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants. Throughout the book Matthew shows that Jesus is the Christ, the Messiah.
The Gospel of Mark was written to the Roman/Gentile mind and focuses on the deity and mission of Christ. Mark records more of Jesus' miracles than sermons.
The Gospel of Luke was written to Theophilus and was intended to establish him in the Christian faith. Luke shows the blood-line-genealogy from Adam and presents Jesus as the son of Adam and the son of God.
The Gospel of John was written "……….that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name" - John 20:31. The gospel of John presents Christ as both God and man, a perfect union of two natures. In every chapter Jesus' deity is revealed and John emphasizes His true identity through titles - Word, only begotten, Lamb of God, Son of God, true Bread, Life, Resurrection, Vine,
All four gospels include Christ's last week and focus on His death and resurrection. This is what they consider to be the major purpose of God becoming man. He came to conquer sin and death through His crucifixion and resurrection.
John emphasizes the divinity of Jesus.
The Gospel of John
John's Gospel is considered to have a high Christology, as it presents Jesus as the divine Word who was with God and was God from the beginning. The Gospel emphasizes Jesus' divine nature, focusing on his role in the plan of salvation and his miracles as signs of his divinity.
mark
The parable of the Good Shepherd is a parable that is only found in the Gospel of John. It emphasizes Jesus as the Good Shepherd who cares for his sheep and is willing to lay down his life for them.
The gospel of John
The gospel of John
A:According to Luke's Gospel, Jesus was related to John the Baptist. His mother Mary was the cousin of John's mother Elizabeth. There are several reasons to doubt this, including that John's Gospel says that the Baptist did not even know Jesus.
Gospel of John
The word gospel means "good news" which is the story of Jesus. The gospel is the story of the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. There can't be a gospel that does not have the story of Jesus in it unless in is an incorrect gospel. All of the gospel books in the KJV Bible - Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John - have the story of Jesus in them.
John refers to the miracles performed by Jesus as "signs" in the Gospel of John. These signs were meant to demonstrate Jesus' divine nature and identity as the Son of God. Each miracle serves as a revelation of Jesus' power and authority.
The concept of Jesus Christ as the Word of God was developed by the author of John's Gospel.
In John's gospel, the "disciple whom Jesus loved" leaned on the breast of Jesus. Late in the second century, Ireneus identified the "disciple whom Jesus loved"as John, one of the twelve, as a result of which the fourth gospel became known as John's Gospel. The scene in which the "disciple whom Jesus loved" leaned on Jesus is not mentioned in any of the earlier gospels, but if Ireneus was correct, then we could say that it was John.