they have been saving 400 francs for Mme loisel dress to the ball.
In a hurry because she had lost her necklace and did not know where it was.
Yes Mme Loisel recognized good quality jewelry
She was anxious because she wasn't wearing the necklace anymore and she wanted to know what happened to it.
In Guy de Maupassant's short story, "The Necklace" (1884), it is Mme. Loisel, the one who borrowed and lost the necklace, who recognizes Mme. Forestier. This meeting sets up the twist ending.
MMe Forestier. It is a counterfeit wearing copy. She smugly does not inform social-climbing Mme Loisel ( la-zell it was pronounced when I had this in English) that it is a wearing copy. she loses it at the ball- exactly how is not stated- a phone call could have saved about sixty grand and a nose-dive into debt slavery and relative poverty.
yes
in the end mme loisel felt that with greater riches would be able to draw the eyes of her husband upon herself
She wants her to see what despair and trouble that necklace had cost her and want her to feel guilty but in the end she get a suprise #Sabrina
Mme Loisel is initially disappointed upon reading the invitation because she had hoped for a more glamorous event. However, she later becomes excited as she sees it as an opportunity to dress up and be in high society.
Mme Loisel had a rich friend, he/she was her former classmate at the convent, whom she did not like to go and see any more because when she came back and saw the poverty of her house/apartment she used to suffer a lot.
Yes, Mme Loisel and her husband are credible characters because they are portrayed realistically with flaws, desires, and motivations that make them relatable to readers. Despite their flaws, they act in a believable manner consistent with their personalities throughout the story.