Oh yes, there have been many of them.
Without Pearl Harbor, there would have been no global war (WW2); at least not until another reason occurred.
Heck no, why fight and lose thousands of lives without a reason. But that is just a matter or opinion
Without context (and particularly without knowing what "the Lincoln's" first reason supposedly was), it's basically impossible to answer this.Actually, my understanding was that Lincoln always had precisely one reason for the civil war: to preserve the Union. Everything else is subsumed in that.
There is (was) only one reason. The A-Bomb. Without the A-Bomb...there would have been no cold war. The "bomb" created a situation in which TOTAL declared wars could no longer be fought without "the risk of mutually assurred destruction" to all peoples involved. Translation: Cold War.
That depends on who you ask, I suppose. However, it is not considered appropriate in modern times, nor is it morally or ethically right to go to war without a good reason. War is truly nothing but systematic, government sanctioned murder, and today, more civilians than soldiers are killed by wars. Even if there is a good reason for a war, war should be avoided by any nation unless another nation attacks.
when there has been a serious domestic or international problem facing the United States. Reason: During the Vietnam War of the 1960s and early 1970s, Presidents committed troops without a declaration of war.
what was one of the reason why the us has been so reluctant to intervene in world war 2
Without the killing aspect, so no war!
Perhaps they have been cut off for some reason
Propellerheads' Record can be used without Reason.
The draft. Without that, opposition to the Vietnam War would've been nil.
One reason was nuclear weapons, the other was a war without qaurtier