There is a tremendous amount of debate about whether nuclear power plants are good in any country. Nuclear power has several advantages: it emits no air pollution or greenhouse gases, and it does not depend upon fossil fuels (which are getting more expensive). The disadvantages are that if a nuclear power plant is not run correctly it can have a very destructive accident (such as the infamous Chernobyl incident) which is far worse than anything that can happen with other kinds of power plants; and it is difficult to dispose of the nuclear waste which they produce. Greater use of solar power and wind power would seem to be a better move.
Only the Philippines can answer this
electricity will be cheaper and it will reduce the need of oil
Yes, the explosion happened in Japan. It was very tragic.
federal constitution 1957 on the right of the individual in Malaysia
It seems sensible to at least build enough new plant to replace the AGR's as they are decommissioned, and keep the fraction of nuclear at around 20 percent
As atoms break and forming elements having more binding energy per nucleon heat energy is released. Hence nuclear energy gets changed into heat energy Right from heat energy mechanical energy is produced This mechanical energy in the presence of magnetic field gets changed into electrical energy. So nuclear ---> heat ---> mechanical ----> electrical
Personally, not right now. They are simply too problematic, especially with regards to the leftover fuel. Once that issue has been corrected, however, they would be quite good and better than most other forms of power generation.
Singapore of course
Nuclear power is being used all the time, in the US and many other countries. If you decide to build a new plant, it obviously takes several years to come on stream
Malaysia you mean; right? Yes, it is a country.
Right Here
I really think Canada, Singapore and Malaysia are the countries have not volcanoes. Is That Right?