Edwin Hubble.
Directly proportional. Greater speed - greater distance.
Frequency is proportional to time, the number of cycles at a certain frequency is proportional to its length(distance).
Its proportional to the product of their masses, and inversely proportional to the square of their distance apart.
No. The word is "inversely", not "conversely". And the force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
Not sure what you mean exactly. At constant velocity, the distance travelled is proportional to the time.
Inversely proportional
Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation states that the force of gravity directly proportional to product of the two masses&inversely proportional to square of the distance between them
Distance and time do not, in general, affect the speed. Speed, however, can affect distance or time. Distance is directly proportional to speed, time is inversely proportional.
Distance is directly proportional to time.(Which simply means that distance covered by object is directly proportional to time it took) Distance= Time*Speed * is the multiplication sign
inversely proportional
Time and distance traveled are directly proportional only if the velocity of the object in question is constant.
gravitational force is directly proportional to mass ie it increases with the increase in mass. it is indirectly proportional to distance ie it decreases with the increase in distance.