Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Well, from what I rmeember, Similarity: Both are derived from an initial observation and hypothesis Difference: A law applies in many areas, a theory doesn't
A scientific theory and a scientific law are similar in that they both propose to describe and predict the behavior of some aspect of nature in terms of a few basic princples. The main difference is that a scientific theory does not yet have enough evidence to verify its validity. A scientific theory becomes a scientific law after enough evidence has been collected, through experimentation, to be reasonably sure that its description of how nature behaves will always be correct. It often takes as long as a hundred years of experiments before a theory is accepted as a law.
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
The Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution both occurred between 1600 - 1800 CE.
It is backed up by scientific evidence.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both based on observations and experimental results.
Since it is called "the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle" it is neither a scientific law nor a theory. It is a principle.
A scientific theory is a theory, no given proof of being a fact, a scientific law is what always happens, essentially a fact. Both is in chemistry and physics. The theory of gravitation happens before it became the Law of gravitation. Scientific theories and laws are similar except laws were proven to be recognize as a fact.
Scientific law is a rule that describes the behavior of something in nature, usually describes what will happen in a situation but not why it happened and scientific theory is an explanation that is supported by results from experimentation or testing.What they have in common is thwey both have something to do with science
They are both based on the scientific method.
Well, from what I rmeember, Similarity: Both are derived from an initial observation and hypothesis Difference: A law applies in many areas, a theory doesn't
A scientific theory and a scientific law are similar in that they both propose to describe and predict the behavior of some aspect of nature in terms of a few basic princples. The main difference is that a scientific theory does not yet have enough evidence to verify its validity. A scientific theory becomes a scientific law after enough evidence has been collected, through experimentation, to be reasonably sure that its description of how nature behaves will always be correct. It often takes as long as a hundred years of experiments before a theory is accepted as a law.
no, both are different. Both have different meaning.
because they are the same subject.
Both scientific laws and scientific theorys can be changed if something new comes up in the scientific world.
Both of them are sub atomic particles. They have different charges on them.
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....