Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
Scientific law is a rule that describes the behavior of something in nature, usually describes what will happen in a situation but not why it happened and scientific theory is an explanation that is supported by results from experimentation or testing.What they have in common is thwey both have something to do with science
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon that is supported by evidence and can be used to make predictions. It is a broad explanation that may encompass multiple related hypotheses. In contrast, a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistently observed behavior in nature but does not explain the underlying reasons for that behavior. Laws are usually more specific and narrow in scope compared to theories.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
The THEORY on which the LAW is based has been tested and (so far) found to be true. A HYPOTHISIS is just a guess ... perhaps a good one, but still a guess.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Expand- Hot Contrast- Cold
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
No, a scientific law is a statement that describes a natural phenomenon, usually in mathematical terms. It is based on repeated observations and experiments. In contrast, a scientific theory is an explanation of why and how a natural phenomenon occurs, supported by evidence and reasoning. Laws and theories work together in science to provide a complete understanding of the natural world.