Final Fantasy I's story is lacking. There is no character development because there are no characters. The game isn't particularly difficult, and the story line is extremely simplistic; gather four generic crystals and the game ends. One could, however, choose your own classes at the beginning of the game and level them until they evolved into more advanced classes; i.e. the thief eventually evolves into the ninja. Final Fantasy II has a more in depth story line and actual characters. The difference in the battle system is that each character is assigned a unique class in Final Fantasy II; the player is unable to choose.
Everything (from characters to story line) in each game of the Final Fantasy series has little or no resemblance to its predecessor.
Final Fantasy II happened in 1988.
The cast of Final Fantasy Origins - 2002 includes: Kenta Miyake as Gus (Final Fantasy II) Yukimasa Obi as Firion (Final Fantasy II) Norika Shitaya as Maria (Final Fantasy II) Takayuki Yamaguchi as Leon (Final Fantasy II)
Final Fantasy II was created on 1988-12-17.
Final Fantasy Legend II happened in 1990.
Yes, Final Fantasy II was released in 1988 on the NES.
Final Fantasy II. Note: The original Final Fantasy II wasn't originally released outside of Japan. When the American Final Fantasy II first came out, it was actually Japan's Final Fantasy V. Firion came from the Japanese Final Fantasy II.
Final Fantasy Legend II was created on 1990-12-14.
Everything is different EXCEPT Final Fantasy X-II, that one is the sequel of Final Fantasy X.
Yes.
There was a Sora in Final Fantasy II but not the same Sora from Kingdom Hearts.
No, the two games do not have interrelated story lines. They are set in 2 different unnamed worlds. Unlike in Ivalice Alliance which explained the connection between Final Fantasy Tactics and Final Fantasy 12, FF1 and FF2 seems to have no connection though they were later marketed together as re-releases.